[PATCH] arm64: bpf: fix div-by-zero case

Shi, Yang yang.shi at linaro.org
Wed Nov 4 10:21:14 PST 2015


On 11/3/2015 11:04 PM, Xi Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:56 PM, Zi Shen Lim <zlim.lnx at gmail.com> wrote:
>>          case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
>>          case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X:
>> +       {
>> +               const u8 r0 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_0];
>> +
>> +               /* if (src == 0) return 0 */
>> +               jmp_offset = 3; /* skip ahead to else path */
>> +               check_imm19(jmp_offset);
>> +               emit(A64_CBNZ(is64, src, jmp_offset), ctx);
>> +               emit(A64_MOVZ(1, r0, 0, 0), ctx);
>> +               jmp_offset = epilogue_offset(ctx);
>> +               check_imm26(jmp_offset);
>> +               emit(A64_B(jmp_offset), ctx);
>> +               /* else */
>>                  emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);
>>                  break;
>> +       }
>>          case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
>>          case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X:
>
> BPF_MOD might need the same fix.

Agreed, and we may need add one more test cases in test_bpf module to 
cover MOD?

Yang

>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel
>




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list