[PATCH v4 5/6] PCI: layerscape: add PCIe support for LS1043a and LS2080a

[Bjorn Helgaas]

On Mon, Nov 02, 2015 at 03:08:04PM -0600, Li Yang wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 1:08 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas at kernel.org> wrote:
> > Hi Leo,
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:38:48PM -0500, Li Yang wrote:
> >> On Wed, Oct 21, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas at kernel.org> wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2015 at 03:19:19PM +0800, Minghuan Lian wrote:
> >> >> Both LS1043a and LS2080a are based on ARMv8 64-bit architecture
> >> >> and have similar PCIe implementation. LUT is added to controller.
> >> >> The patch removes the necessary fields from struct ls_pcie.
> >> >>
> >> >> Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian at freescale.com>
> >> >> ---
> >> >> This patch is based on v4.3-rc4 and [PATCH v10 3/6]
> >> >> PCI: designware: Add ARM64 support.
> >>
> >> Hi Bjorn,
> >>
> >> Are you also applying this patch
> >> https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/531184/ in this merge windows?
> >> Because the new hardware can only work with the generic ARM64 support
> >> added in the designware pcie driver.
> >
> > I'm reviewing that patch right now, and I do hope to apply it for
> > v4.4.
> >
> > There was no cover letter for this series (Minghuan's Layerscape v4
> > series), and I didn't see any mention of dependencies, so I applied it
> > on top of v4.3-rc1.  Is that the wrong thing to do?  If it depends on
> > the Zhou's v11 series, I can hold the Layerscape branch until after
> > that.
> 
> I noticed that you have merged Zhou's latest patch.  Probably you can
> also merge the Layerscape branch now.

That's my intention.

Bjorn