[PATCH v8 6/7] clk: hi6220: Clock driver support for Hisilicon hi6220 SoC
mturquette at linaro.org
Thu May 28 18:07:33 PDT 2015
Quoting Kevin Hilman (2015-05-28 10:32:05)
> Bintian <bintian.wang at huawei.com> writes:
> > Hello Mike,
> > On 2015/5/28 13:26, Michael Turquette wrote:
> >> Quoting Bintian Wang (2015-05-23 21:11:11)
> >>> Add clock drivers for hi6220 SoC, this driver controls the SoC
> >>> registers to supply different clocks to different IPs in the SoC.
> >>> We add one divider clock for hi6220 because the divider in hi6220
> >>> also has a mask bit but it doesnot obey the rule defined by flag
> >>> "CLK_DIVIDER_HIWORD_MASK", we can not get index of the mask bit by
> >>> left shift fixed bits (e.g. 16 bits), so we add this divider clock
> >>> to handle it.
> >>> Signed-off-by: Jorge Ramirez-Ortiz <jorge.ramirez-ortiz at linaro.org>
> >>> Signed-off-by: Bintian Wang <bintian.wang at huawei.com>
> >>> Acked-by: Haojian Zhuang <haojian.zhuang at linaro.org>
> >>> Reviewed-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao at linaro.org>
> >>> Tested-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> >>> Tested-by: Tyler Baker <tyler.baker at linaro.org>
> >> Hi Bintian,
> >> Thanks for making the changes requested by Stephen. I've taken his patch
> >> to add assigned-clock-rate/parent support for AMBA interconnects and
> >> applied it to 4.1-rc1, and then I've applied your v8 patches #4-6 on top
> >> of that. You can find it at:
> >> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git clk-next-hi6220
> > Thank you very much!
> > I think you also need to pick patch "[PATCH v5 3/6] clk: hi6220:
> > Document devicetree bindings for hi6220 clock", which described the
> > dt binding of clk, and it is also acked by Stephen(v4 is the same to
> > v5).
> >> I have merged this into clk-next so it can get some cycles in
> >> linux-next.
> >> Stephen,
> >> Can you send your patch out to Russell properly? It needs his ack (or
> >> for him to take it outright) in order to unblock the hi6220 clock driver
> >> from being merged.
> > It doesn't block hi6220 clock driver now, because the UART1 is not
> > enabled in hi6220 dts now.
> Now that the clk changes are queued up, can you (re)post the remaining
> hikey patches with a changelog stating the dependency on the clk-next
> branch. I believe what's left is just the DT and Kconfig/defconfig
> changes, correct?
Just to be clear, clk-next-hi6220 is not an immutable branch. I just put
it up to get some testing done on it. Depending on whether or not
Russell acks Stephen's patch then it may be changed.
> With some acks from the DT maintainers, these should be ready to be
> merged through arm-soc.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel