[RESEND][ PATCH v3] irqchip/gicv3-its: ITS table size should not be smaller than PSZ

[Stuart Yoder]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx at linutronix.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 3:09 PM
> To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> Cc: marc.zyngier at arm.com; jason at lakedaemon.net; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> kernel at lists.infradead.org; Lian Minghuan-B31939
> Subject: RE: [RESEND][ PATCH v3] irqchip/gicv3-its: ITS table size should not be smaller than PSZ
> 
> On Wed, 20 May 2015, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> 
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Thomas Gleixner [mailto:tglx at linutronix.de]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 20, 2015 2:26 PM
> > > To: Yoder Stuart-B08248
> > > Cc: marc.zyngier at arm.com; jason at lakedaemon.net; linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-
> > > kernel at lists.infradead.org; Lian Minghuan-B31939
> > > Subject: Re: [RESEND][ PATCH v3] irqchip/gicv3-its: ITS table size should not be smaller than PSZ
> > >
> > > On Wed, 20 May 2015, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > >
> > > > when allocating a device table, if the requested allocation
> > > > is smaller than the default granule size of the ITS
> > > > then, we need to round up to the default size
> > > >
> > >
> > > So who wrote that patch? That's not a valid SOB chain ....
> >
> > Minghuan wrote the original patch (v1,v2), making the functional change.
> > I wrote/added the comments and submitted v3, after discussing with
> > Minghuan.
> >
> > Given that, what is the correct signed-off-by chain?
> 
> From: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian at freescale.com>
> 
> Signed-off-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian at freescale.com>
> [ Stuart: Added comments and massaged changelog]
> Signed-off-by: Stuart Yoder <stuart.yoder at freescale.com>
> 
> So the authorship gets attributed to Minghuan and it's noticed in the
> changelog that you added comments and the changelog updates and then
> sent the patch.
> 
> I'll apply it with that change, ok?

Sure.  Thanks!

Stuart