[PATCH v2 02/17] leds: port locomo leds driver to new locomo core

Jacek Anaszewski j.anaszewski at samsung.com
Wed May 13 07:53:03 PDT 2015


On 05/13/2015 04:14 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
> 2015-05-13 13:31 GMT+03:00 Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski at samsung.com>:
>> On 05/12/2015 05:35 PM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>>
>>> 2015-05-06 18:05 GMT+03:00 Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski at samsung.com>:
>>>>
>>>> On 04/28/2015 01:55 AM, Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Adapt locomo leds driver to new locomo core setup.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Eremin-Solenikov <dbaryshkov at gmail.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>>     drivers/leds/Kconfig       |   1 -
>>>>>     drivers/leds/leds-locomo.c | 119
>>>>> +++++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
>>>>>     2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/leds/Kconfig b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>>> index 966b960..4b4650b 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/leds/Kconfig
>>>>> @@ -79,7 +79,6 @@ config LEDS_LM3642
>>>>>     config LEDS_LOCOMO
>>>>>           tristate "LED Support for Locomo device"
>>>>>           depends on LEDS_CLASS
>>>>> -       depends on SHARP_LOCOMO
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Why do you remove this dependency?
>>>
>>>
>>> Because SHARP_LOCOMO is a Kconfig symbol for the old driver. New driver
>>> uses MFD_LOCOMO Kconfig entry. Also the driver now uses generic platform
>>> device and regmap interfaces, so there is no direct dependency on main
>>> LoCoMo driver. And the policy (IIRC) was not to have such dependencies.
>>
>>
>> Ack. Shouldn't you also need "select REGMAP_MMIO" ?
>
> No. Maybe I should add "select REGMAP" instead.

REGMAP is enabled by default if REGMAP_MMIO is enabled. Having
REGMAP_MMIO selected would also allow to notice at first glance which
regmap backend is used. This would in turn provide a straightforward
explanation on why brightness_set op is not delegated to work queue.

>>>>>    static void locomoled_brightness_set(struct led_classdev *led_cdev,
>>>>> -                               enum led_brightness value, int offset)
>>>>> +                               enum led_brightness value)
>>>>>     {
>>>>> -       struct locomo_dev *locomo_dev =
>>>>> LOCOMO_DEV(led_cdev->dev->parent);
>>>>> -       unsigned long flags;
>>>>> +       struct locomo_led *led = container_of(led_cdev, struct
>>>>> locomo_led,
>>>>> led);
>>>>>
>>>>> -       local_irq_save(flags);
>>>>> -       if (value)
>>>>> -               locomo_writel(LOCOMO_LPT_TOFH, locomo_dev->mapbase +
>>>>> offset);
>>>>> -       else
>>>>> -               locomo_writel(LOCOMO_LPT_TOFL, locomo_dev->mapbase +
>>>>> offset);
>>>>> -       local_irq_restore(flags);
>>>>> +       regmap_write(led->regmap, led->reg,
>>>>> +                       value ? LOCOMO_LPT_TOFH : LOCOMO_LPT_TOFL);
>>>>>     }
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Please use work queue for setting brightness. This is required for the
>>>> driver to be compatible with led triggers. You can refer to the
>>>> existing LED drivers on how to implement this.
>>>
>>>
>>> Hmm. Why? The regmap here uses MMIO access, so it is atomic operation
>>> and doesn't need to be wrapped into work queue, does it?
>>
>>
>> Triggers can call brightness_set op in the interrupt context, so it
>> cannot sleep. I see "map->lock(map->lock_arg)" in regmap_write, thus
>> I am inferring that it can sleep.
>>
>> I am not sure if regmap implements its 'lock' op when using MMIO.
>>
>> The best way to figure this out is turning "LED Timer Trigger" on
>> in the config and execute:
>>
>> echo "timer" > trigger
>
> It works without any "might sleep/sleeping in atomic context" warnings.
>
> Technically I'd agree with you. If I'm using regmaps, ideally I should not
> depend on the exact backend and put working with it to the work queue.
> However as this is a driver for quite old IP block, it is not used with
> regmap backends other than MMIO, I'd deduce, it's ok to do things
> in a more relaxed way and to call regmap_write even from atomic
> contexts.

Ack.

-- 
Best Regards,
Jacek Anaszewski



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list