[PATCH 1/1] ARM:r0 is also corrupted after calling __do_div64.
Chen Gang
gangchen at rdamicro.com
Tue May 12 03:40:01 PDT 2015
R0 is corrupted after calling __do_div64 and compiler is not informed
about this in macro __do_div_asm. If n is to be used again after this
macro, r0 is not reloaded and n will contain incorrect value
Signed-off-by: Chen Gang <gangchen at rdamicro.com>
---
arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h b/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
index a66061a..4829618 100644
--- a/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
+++ b/arch/arm/include/asm/div64.h
@@ -34,13 +34,15 @@
register unsigned long long __n asm("r0") = n; \
register unsigned long long __res asm("r2"); \
register unsigned int __rem asm(__xh); \
+ register unsigned int __clobber asm(__xl); \
asm( __asmeq("%0", __xh) \
- __asmeq("%1", "r2") \
- __asmeq("%2", "r0") \
- __asmeq("%3", "r4") \
+ __asmeq("%1", __xl) \
+ __asmeq("%2", "r2") \
+ __asmeq("%3", "r0") \
+ __asmeq("%4", "r4") \
"bl __do_div64" \
- : "=r" (__rem), "=r" (__res) \
- : "r" (__n), "r" (__base) \
+ : "=r"(__rem), "=r"(__clobber), "=r"(__res) \
+ : "r"(__n), "r"(__base) \
: "ip", "lr", "cc"); \
n = __res; \
__rem; \
--
1.9.1
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list