Memory size unaligned to section boundary

[Russell King - ARM Linux]

On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 03:54:00PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On 09-05-15 15:48, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> >On Sat, May 09, 2015 at 03:38:16PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> >>Ok, so does that mean that Mark's original patch:
> >>
> >>---->8----
> >>diff --git a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> >>index 4e6ef89..2ea13f0 100644
> >>--- a/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> >>+++ b/arch/arm/mm/mmu.c
> >>@@ -1125,9 +1125,9 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
> >>                          * occurs before any free memory is mapped.
> >>                          */
> >>                         if (!memblock_limit) {
> >>-                               if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_start, SECTION_SIZE))
> >>+                               if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_start, PMD_SIZE))
> >>                                         memblock_limit = block_start;
> >>-                               else if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_end, SECTION_SIZE))
> >>+                               else if (!IS_ALIGNED(block_end, PMD_SIZE))
> >>                                         memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
> >>                         }
> >>
> >>@@ -1142,7 +1142,7 @@ void __init sanity_check_meminfo(void)
> >>          * last full section, which should be mapped.
> >>          */
> >>         if (memblock_limit)
> >>-               memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, SECTION_SIZE);
> >>+               memblock_limit = round_down(memblock_limit, PMD_SIZE);
> >>         if (!memblock_limit)
> >>                 memblock_limit = arm_lowmem_limit;
> >>
> >>
> >>Is good, or do we only need to have the last chunk of this patch ?
> >
> >That should do it, thanks.
> 
> "that should do it" means the entire patch or only the last chunk?

Entire patch.

-- 
FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line: currently at 10.5Mbps down 400kbps up
according to speedtest.net.