[PATCH v4 10/13] arm64: move kernel mapping out of linear region

Ard Biesheuvel ard.biesheuvel at linaro.org
Fri May 8 10:26:05 PDT 2015


On 8 May 2015 at 19:16, Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 05:34:21PM +0200, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> index f800d45ea226..801331793bd3 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/memory.h
>> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>>  #include <linux/compiler.h>
>>  #include <linux/const.h>
>>  #include <linux/types.h>
>> +#include <asm/boot.h>
>>  #include <asm/sizes.h>
>>
>>  /*
>> @@ -39,7 +40,12 @@
>>  #define PCI_IO_SIZE          SZ_16M
>>
>>  /*
>> - * PAGE_OFFSET - the virtual address of the start of the kernel image (top
>> + * Offset below PAGE_OFFSET where to map the kernel Image.
>> + */
>> +#define KIMAGE_OFFSET                MAX_KIMG_SIZE
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * PAGE_OFFSET - the virtual address of the base of the linear mapping (top
>>   *            (VA_BITS - 1))
>>   * VA_BITS - the maximum number of bits for virtual addresses.
>>   * TASK_SIZE - the maximum size of a user space task.
>> @@ -49,7 +55,8 @@
>>   */
>>  #define VA_BITS                      (CONFIG_ARM64_VA_BITS)
>>  #define PAGE_OFFSET          (UL(0xffffffffffffffff) << (VA_BITS - 1))
>> -#define MODULES_END          (PAGE_OFFSET)
>> +#define KIMAGE_VADDR         (PAGE_OFFSET - KIMAGE_OFFSET)
>> +#define MODULES_END          KIMAGE_VADDR
>>  #define MODULES_VADDR                (MODULES_END - SZ_64M)
>>  #define PCI_IO_END           (MODULES_VADDR - SZ_2M)
>>  #define PCI_IO_START         (PCI_IO_END - PCI_IO_SIZE)
>> @@ -77,7 +84,11 @@
>>   * private definitions which should NOT be used outside memory.h
>>   * files.  Use virt_to_phys/phys_to_virt/__pa/__va instead.
>>   */
>> -#define __virt_to_phys(x)    (((phys_addr_t)(x) - PAGE_OFFSET + PHYS_OFFSET))
>> +#define __virt_to_phys(x) ({                                         \
>> +     long __x = (long)(x) - PAGE_OFFSET;                             \
>> +     __x >= 0 ? (phys_addr_t)(__x + PHYS_OFFSET) :                   \
>> +                (phys_addr_t)(__x + PHYS_OFFSET + kernel_va_offset); })
>
> Just wondering, when do we need a __pa on kernel addresses? But it looks
> to me like second case is always (__x + PHYS_OFFSET + KIMAGE_OFFSET).

For now, yes. But when the kernel Image moves up in physical memory,
and/or the kernel virtual image moves down in virtual memory (for
kaslr) this offset could increase.

> Before map_mem(), we have phys_offset_bias set but kernel_va_offset 0.
> After map_mem(), we reset the former and set the latter. Maybe we can
> get rid of kernel_va_offset entirely (see more below about
> phys_offset_bias).
>


>> +
>>  #define __phys_to_virt(x)    ((unsigned long)((x) - PHYS_OFFSET + PAGE_OFFSET))
>>
>>  /*
>> @@ -111,7 +122,16 @@
>>
>>  extern phys_addr_t           memstart_addr;
>>  /* PHYS_OFFSET - the physical address of the start of memory. */
>> -#define PHYS_OFFSET          ({ memstart_addr; })
>> +#define PHYS_OFFSET          ({ memstart_addr + phys_offset_bias; })
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * Before the linear mapping has been set up, __va() translations will
>> + * not produce usable virtual addresses unless we tweak PHYS_OFFSET to
>> + * compensate for the offset between the kernel mapping and the base of
>> + * the linear mapping. We will undo this in map_mem().
>> + */
>> +extern u64 phys_offset_bias;
>> +extern u64 kernel_va_offset;
>
> Can we not add the bias to memstart_addr during boot and reset it later
> in map_mem()? Otherwise the run-time kernel ends up having to do a dummy
> addition any time it needs PHYS_OFFSET.
>

Yes, that is how I started out. At some point during development, that
became a bit cumbersome, because for instance, when you remove the
memory that is inaccessible, you want memstart_addr to contain a
meaningful value and not have to undo the bias. But looking at this
version of the series, I think there are no references left to
memstart_addr.



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list