[RFC v2 0/4] chip/vgic adaptations for forwarded irq
Eric Auger
eric.auger at linaro.org
Wed May 6 08:32:53 PDT 2015
On 05/06/2015 04:27 PM, Christoffer Dall wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Wed, Feb 11, 2015 at 09:20:53AM +0100, Eric Auger wrote:
>> This series proposes some fixes that appeared to be necessary
>> to integrate IRQ forwarding in KVM/VFIO.
>>
>> - deactivation of the forwarded IRQ in irq_disabled case
>> - a specific handling of forwarded IRQ into the VGIC state machine.
>> - deactivation of physical IRQ and unforwarding on vgic destruction
>> - rb_tree lock in vgic.c
>>
>> Integrated pieces can be found at
>> ssh://git.linaro.org/people/eric.auger/linux.git
>> on branch irqfd_integ_v9
>>
> What are the dependencies for this at this point?
>
> I assume it relies at least on the split EOI/priority drop changes?
Yes it now only depends on split EOI/priority drop changes since
"genirq: Saving/restoring the irqchip state of an irq line" now is
upstreamed.
>
> Are you going to respin this when there are newer versions of the
> dependencies out, or what are the plans?
Yes I will respin according to new versions. I am currently using a
rebased version of Marc's original RFC "ARM: Forwarding physical
interrupts to a guest VM" (http://lwn.net/Articles/603514/) which is a
superset of [PATCH] genirq: Add support for priority-drop/deactivate
interrupt controllers.
- Eric
>
> Thanks,
> -Christoffer
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list