[PATCH v3 2/2] arm64: perf: Fix callchain parse error with kernel tracepoint events
Hou Pengyang
houpengyang at huawei.com
Tue May 5 21:13:26 PDT 2015
On 2015/5/6 1:00, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Sat, May 02, 2015 at 06:58:17AM +0100, Hou Pengyang wrote:
>> For ARM64, when tracing with tracepoint events, the IP and pstate are set
>> to 0, preventing the perf code parsing the callchain and resolving the
>> symbols correctly.
>>
>> ./perf record -e sched:sched_switch -g --call-graph dwarf ls
>> [ perf record: Captured and wrote 0.146 MB perf.data ]
>> ./perf report -f
>> Samples: 194 of event 'sched:sched_switch', Event count (approx.): 194
>> Children Self Command Shared Object Symbol
>> 100.00% 100.00% ls [unknown] [.] 0000000000000000
>>
>> The fix is to implement perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs for ARM64, which fills
>> several necessary registers used for callchain unwinding, including pc,sp,
>> fp and spsr .
>>
>> With this patch, callchain can be parsed correctly as follows:
>>
>> ......
>> + 2.63% 0.00% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] vfs_symlink
>> + 2.63% 0.00% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] follow_down
>> + 2.63% 0.00% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] pfkey_get
>> + 2.63% 0.00% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] do_execveat_common.isra.33
>> - 2.63% 0.00% ls [kernel.kallsyms] [k] pfkey_send_policy_notify
>> pfkey_send_policy_notify
>> pfkey_get
>> v9fs_vfs_rename
>> page_follow_link_light
>> link_path_walk
>> el0_svc_naked
>> .......
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Hou Pengyang <houpengyang at huawei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h | 7 +++++++
>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> index d26d1d5..cc92021 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/perf_event.h
>> @@ -24,4 +24,11 @@ extern unsigned long perf_misc_flags(struct pt_regs *regs);
>> #define perf_misc_flags(regs) perf_misc_flags(regs)
>> #endif
>>
>> +#define perf_arch_fetch_caller_regs(regs, __ip) { \
>> + (regs)->ARM_pc = (__ip); \
>> + (regs)->ARM_fp = (unsigned long) __builtin_frame_address(0); \
>> + (regs)->ARM_sp = current_stack_pointer; \
>> + (regs)->ARM_cpsr = PSR_MODE_EL1h; \
>> +}
>
> This can't possibly compile, therefore you can't possibly have tested it.
>
I am so sorry. I did test the patch, but on mainline 4.0 +
David long's patches for ARM64 kprobe which are not included in
mainline now. In David's patches, there are macros like ARM_pc, ARM_fp,
ARM_sp and ARM_cpsr, my patch incorrectly used these macros which
results in such compile errors if applied to 4.0 directly:
error: 'struct pt_regs' has no member named 'ARM_pc'
error: 'struct pt_regs' has no member named 'ARM_fp'
error: 'struct pt_regs' has no member named 'ARM_sp'
error: 'struct pt_regs' has no member named 'ARM_cpsr'
I will fix the code and do more test.
> Please fix the code and actually check that you're getting sensible
> callchains before sending a new version of the patch.
>
> Thanks,
>
> Will
>
> .
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list