[PATCH] arm64: dts: Add idle-states for Juno
Catalin Marinas
catalin.marinas at arm.com
Fri May 1 02:02:02 PDT 2015
On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 06:17:01PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 30, 2015 at 05:40:35PM +0100, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > On Thu, 2015-04-30 at 17:00 +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > > On 30/04/15 14:57, Jon Medhurst (Tixy) wrote:
> > > > From: Jon Medhurst <tixy at linaro.org>
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Jon Medhurst <tixy at linaro.org>
> > > > ---
> > > >
> > > > These have been kicking around out of tree for ages, any reason they
> > > > shouldn't be in mainline?
> > >
> > > One possible reason could be that these values are not tuned(e.g.
> > > latency values, can they be same for both clusters ?)
> >
> > I thought that both clusters being the same was questionable.
> >
> > > Though these
> > > reasons are not blocking and this patch will not cause any
> > > functionality break even if is merged as is.
> >
> > My main purpose with trying to get this merged is so that people using
> > Juno for general testing and validation will actually have cpuidle
> > running and so potentially find more bugs.
>
> I am reluctant to enable idle states in the default Juno dts, they
> will affect latencies and performance tests significantly.
OTOH, I guess they will improve the power benchmarks. IMO, we should
place in the DT whatever the hardware and firmware supports. It's up to
those doing benchmarks to disable CPU suspend.
--
Catalin
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list