[PATCH 1/2] pinctrl: at91: Add set_multiple GPIO chip feature
Alexander Stein
alexanders83 at web.de
Fri Mar 27 04:54:23 PDT 2015
Hello Ludovic,
On Friday 27 March 2015, 11:11:52 wrote Ludovic Desroches:
> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 08:12:00PM +0100, Alexander Stein wrote:
> > This adds the callback for set_multiple.
> > As this controller has a separate set and clear register, we can't write
> > directly to PIO_ODSR as this would required a cached variable and would
> > race with at91_gpio_set.
> > So build masks for the PIO_SODR and PIO_CODR registers and write them
> > together.
>
> Sure seems safer and easier to use SODR and CODR.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Alexander Stein <alexanders83 at web.de>
> Acked-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches at atmel.com>
>
> A question below.
>
> > ---
> > This was tested by using an own test driver which uses
> > gpiod_set_array_cansleep to set multiple GPIOs at once.
> >
> > drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > index f4cd0b9..a882523 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
> > @@ -1330,6 +1330,33 @@ static void at91_gpio_set(struct gpio_chip *chip, unsigned offset,
> > writel_relaxed(mask, pio + (val ? PIO_SODR : PIO_CODR));
> > }
> >
> > +static void at91_gpio_set_multiple(struct gpio_chip *chip,
> > + unsigned long *mask, unsigned long *bits)
> > +{
> > + struct at91_gpio_chip *at91_gpio = to_at91_gpio_chip(chip);
> > + void __iomem *pio = at91_gpio->regbase;
> > + unsigned long set_mask;
> > + unsigned long clear_mask;
> > + size_t i;
> > +
> > + set_mask = 0;
> > + clear_mask = 0;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < chip->ngpio; i++) {
> > + if (*mask == 0)
> > + break;
> > + if (__test_and_clear_bit(i, mask)) {
>
> For my knowledge, why do you need to clear the mask?
I tried to do the same as mpc8xxx_gpio_set_multiple. I think the reason is that an empty mask will quit that loop potentially earlier.
Best regards,
Alexander
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list