[PATCH v8 19/30] powerpc/pci: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() for simplicity
Daniel Axtens
dja at axtens.net
Tue Mar 24 16:58:43 PDT 2015
On Tue, 2015-03-24 at 11:34 +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> Now we could use pci_scan_host_bridge() to scan
> pci buses, provide powerpc specific pci_host_bridge_ops.
>
> Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing at huawei.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh at kernel.crashing.org>
> CC: linuxppc-dev at lists.ozlabs.org
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> index 2c58200..e2b50a2 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/pci-common.c
> @@ -773,6 +773,29 @@ void pcibios_set_root_bus_speed(struct pci_host_bridge *bridge)
> return ppc_md.pcibios_set_root_bus_speed(bridge);
> }
>
> +static int pci_host_scan_bus(struct pci_host_bridge *host)
> +{
> + int mode = PCI_PROBE_NORMAL;
> + struct pci_bus *bus = host->bus;
> + struct pci_controller *hose = dev_get_drvdata(&host->dev);
Is there any reason this isn't *hose = pci_bus_to_host(bus)?
> +
> + /* Get probe mode and perform scan */
> + if (hose->dn && ppc_md.pci_probe_mode)
> + mode = ppc_md.pci_probe_mode(bus);
> +
> + pr_debug(" probe mode: %d\n", mode);
> + if (mode == PCI_PROBE_DEVTREE)
> + of_scan_bus(hose->dn, bus);
> +
> + if (mode == PCI_PROBE_NORMAL) {
> + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bus, 255);
> + hose->last_busno = pci_scan_child_bus(bus);
> + pci_bus_update_busn_res_end(bus, hose->last_busno);
> + }
> +
> + return pci_bus_child_max_busnr(bus);
> +}
> +
I'm having trouble convincing myself that this patch covers every
variation within our PCI implementations. In particular, there's a
stanza in of_scan_pci_bridge in kernel/pci_of_scan.c that's almost
identical to this function. Does that implementation need to be cleaned
up and replaced with this function too?
> @@ -1641,9 +1655,9 @@ void pcibios_scan_phb(struct pci_controller *hose)
> ppc_md.pcibios_fixup_phb(hose);
>
> /* Configure PCI Express settings */
> - if (bus && !pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
> + if (host->bus && !pci_has_flag(PCI_PROBE_ONLY)) {
> struct pci_bus *child;
> - list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node)
> + list_for_each_entry(child, &host->bus->children, node)
> pcie_bus_configure_settings(child);
> }
> }
Two things: Firstly, the function uses hose throughout, not host.
Secondly, you're not deleting the bus variable: what's the purpose of
this change?
Regards,
Daniel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 860 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150325/3fafd5a7/attachment.sig>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list