[PATCH 4/7] regulator: add mxs regulator driver
broonie at kernel.org
Mon Mar 23 11:39:12 PDT 2015
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 06:45:41PM +0100, Stefan Wahren wrote:
> > So, this isn't actually quite a busy wait because we do a schedule()
> > rather than a cpu_relax() but still it could devolve into that - 20ms
> > seems a long time to burn doing that. If we're expecting this to finish
> > very quickly can we do an initial busy wait then fall back to something
> > with an actual sleep or soemthing?
> We will need to keep the initial usleep_range(). So do you think of the
> 1. usleep_range
> 2. busy_wait for BM_POWER_STS_DC_OK
> 3. msleep (for the timeout case)
That's what I'm suggesting - do the initial busy wait for a reasonably
short time period and then fall back to something that sleeps.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the linux-arm-kernel