[PATCH v10 00/21] Introduce ACPI for ARM64 based on ACPI 5.1
Julien Grall
julien.grall at linaro.org
Sun Mar 22 14:32:48 PDT 2015
On 22/03/2015 21:49, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Sunday, March 22, 2015 09:05:21 PM Julien Grall wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> On 21/03/2015 12:09, Naresh Bhat wrote:
>>> From 268dcdafa34a690e2f99c0784ca33a6d2352ecf5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>>> From: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org <mailto:hanjun.guo at linaro.org>>
>>> Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2015 14:43:54 +0800
>>> Subject: [PATCH] XEN / ACPI: Make XEN ACPI depend on X86
>>>
>>> When ACPI is enabled on ARM64, XEN ACPI will also compiled
>>> into the kernel, but XEN ACPI is x86 dependent, so introduce
>>> CONFIG_XEN_ACPI to make it depend on x86 before XEN ACPI is
>>> functional on ARM64.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org
>>> <mailto:hanjun.guo at linaro.org>>
>>> ---
>>> drivers/xen/Kconfig | 4 ++++
>>> drivers/xen/Makefile | 2 +-
>>> 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/Kconfig b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>>> index b812462..a31cd29 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/Kconfig
>>> @@ -253,4 +253,8 @@ config XEN_EFI
>>> def_bool y
>>> depends on X86_64 && EFI
>>>
>>> +config XEN_ACPI
>>> + def_bool y
>>> + depends on X86 && ACPI
>>> +
>>> endmenu
>>> diff --git a/drivers/xen/Makefile b/drivers/xen/Makefile
>>> index 2ccd359..f4622ab 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/xen/Makefile
>>> +++ b/drivers/xen/Makefile
>>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@ CFLAGS_efi.o += -fshort-wchar
>>>
>>> dom0-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci.o
>>> dom0-$(CONFIG_USB_SUPPORT) += dbgp.o
>>> -dom0-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o $(xen-pad-y)
>>> +dom0-$(CONFIG_XEN_ACPI) += acpi.o $(xen-pad-y)
>>> xen-pad-$(CONFIG_X86) += xen-acpi-pad.o
>>> dom0-$(CONFIG_X86) += pcpu.o
>>> obj-$(CONFIG_XEN_DOM0) += $(dom0-y)
>>
>> [..]
>>
>>>
>>> AFAIK, There is already a kernel patch exists to fix this issue. I
>>> think Julien or Parth is a right person to ask. Hence I am CCed Julien
>>> Grall too.
>>
>> The ACPI support for Xen is not ready. So I think avoiding to compile
>> drivers/xen/acpi.c on ARM64/ARM seems the better solution for now.
>>
>> Although, rather than introducing a new CONFIG option, I would use the
>> same trick we use within the Makefile to avoid hotplug.c on ARM/ARM64.
>>
>> ifeq ($(filter y, $(CONFIG_ARM) $(CONFIG_ARM64)), )
>> dom0-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o $(xen-pad-y)
>> endif
>
> Well, is avoiding an extra CONFIG_ option worth the ugliness of this?
When the support of ACPI for Xen will come, the CONFIG_ option will be
an alias to CONFIG_XEN.
In this case the CONFIG_ option won't bring much improvement to the code
and add an extra indirection.
The "ugliness" option has, at least, the advantage to be tiny and
self-contained.
Regards,
--
Julien Grall
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list