[PATCH v6 2/6] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks

Kalle Valo kvalo at codeaurora.org
Fri Mar 20 07:00:47 PDT 2015


Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> writes:

>> I prefer these going through the omap tree. Like Eliad said,
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti does not get that many changes nowadays so the
>> chances of this patchset conflicting with something is very small.
>
> OK great. In that case no need to rearrange the patches, I can
> apply them into an immutable branch once the pending issues have
> been fixed if Kalle acks them.
>
> To avoid merge conflicts that branch is easiest done against
> v4.0-rc4. Kalle and Arnd, does that work for you guys?
>
> I can also base it on 5b7610f23562 ("ARM: OMAP2+: Fix wl12xx on
> dm3730-evm with mainline u-boot") that's on top of -rc2 plus few
> other fixes now merged to -rc4 mainline if we need a branch based
> on an earlier tag.

Sorry, it seems I forgot to answer this one:

Either baseline is good for me, I can't think of any problems with
either one. But please do remember that I'm a new maintainer, I might
very well miss something ;)

-- 
Kalle Valo



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list