[PATCH v3 1/4] i2c: mux-pinctrl: Rework to honor disabled child nodes
wsa at the-dreams.de
Fri Mar 20 03:19:25 PDT 2015
> Ok, I see what you mean. I had a look at the place in question and
> wonder what to return from i2c_add_mux_adapter() in the disabled
> case so that i2c-mux-pinctrl is still happy with the returned value.
Ouch, you are right. The crux of interfaces returning NULL instead of an
ERR_PTR :( I'll have a look, I maybe started to fix this somewhen.
> I guess what you want to have is that i2c_add_adapter() is not called
> for the disabled case, right?
I think that makes sense.
> Is the i2c_adapter struct prepared in i2c_mux_add_adapter() still valid
> if i2c_add_adapter() is not called?
I will have a closer look to the issue this weekend.
> Sorry, I am not too deep into i2c subsystem, I just reworked i2c-mux-
> pinctrl to make it work on Dove. If you are fine with giving me some
> guidance how you prefer to have it done, I can try to free some spare
Cool, thanks. Learning by doing is a good way to get such knowledge :)
> Unfortunately there is already little of it, so please don't
> expect a quick tested patch.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Size: 819 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
More information about the linux-arm-kernel