[UPDATED] [PATCH 3/5] arm-cci: Get rid of secure transactions for PMU driver
Suzuki K. Poulose
Suzuki.Poulose at arm.com
Thu Mar 19 10:52:54 PDT 2015
On 19/03/15 17:38, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 19/03/15 17:32, Mark Rutland wrote:
>> One more thing:
>>
>>> @@ -883,7 +894,11 @@ static inline const struct cci_pmu_model *get_cci_model(struct platform_device *
>>> pdev->dev.of_node);
>>> if (!match)
>>> return NULL;
>>> + if (match->data)
>>> + return match->data;
>>>
>>> + dev_warn(&pdev->dev, "DEPRECATED compatible property,"
>>> + "requires secure access to CCI registers");
>>> return probe_cci_model(pdev);
>>> }
>>
>> Before the probe, could we please have:
>>
>> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM))
>> return -EINVAL;
>>
>> On arm64 we require a model-specific string, and we shouldn't go
>> touching secure-only registers.
>>
>
> IIUC platform_has_secure_cci_access always return false for ARM64
> preventing any secure access. No ?
>
Yes, you are right. The check has been abstracted away with the
platform_has_secure_cci_access().
Cheers
Suzuki
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list