sunxi: cpufreq-dt usage causes schedule_delayed_work to execute sooner?
Chen-Yu Tsai
wens at csie.org
Mon Mar 16 19:39:04 PDT 2015
Hi Hans,
On Tue, Mar 17, 2015 at 4:18 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi ChenYu, Maxime,
>
> For the sunxi musb code I've been writing uses schedule_delayed_work in a
> few places,
> while looking at debugging printk-s in dmesg I noticed that the time stamps
> between
> scheduling the work and executing it are of.
>
> If I build a kernel without cpufreq-dt or do:
>
> echo performance > scaling_governor
>
> The problem goes away.
>
> I've done some debugging and the problem is not the actual timing of the
> code, the timestamps in the dmesg output are wrong, very wrong even
> here are 2 messages where I plugged in a cable, then waited 10 seconds
> using a clock with a second hand to count them of, then unplugged:
>
>
> [ 635.006201] musb vbus 0 -> 1
> [ 637.877098] musb vbus 1 -> 0
>
> This is after doing:
>
> echo powersave > scaling_governor
>
> So it seems that the clocksource used by printk to generate timestamps
> goes slower as we scale down cpufreq, not good (tm).
>
> This:
>
> [root at localhost clocksource0]# cat available_clocksource
> arch_sys_counter timer hstimer
> [root at localhost clocksource0]# echo timer > current_clocksource
> [ 725.728887] Switched to clocksource timer
>
> Does not help.
>
> I believe that the "sched_clock_register(sun5i_timer_sched_read, 32, rate);"
> call in drivers/clocksource/timer-sun5i.c is the culprit, it seems this ends
> up overriding the sched_clock_register call in
> drivers/clocksource/arm_arch_timer.c which likely does not suffer from
> cpufreq
> issues, and is faster (part of the cpucore) then using the hstimer anyways.
>
> Note I've not tested yet if disabling the hstimer fixes things, but I
> believe
> it will. Note that the hstimer will likewise be a bad clockevent source too,
> this can be fixed by registering a cpufreq notifier and calling
> clockevents_update_freq
> whenever the cpufreq, and thus the hstimer clkrate changes.
>
> Alternatively we could simply remove the driver altogether since the kernel
> prefers the sun4i_tick eventsource anyways.
Maxime has a series of patches to fix this:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/1/11/52
Another thing we could do is mux AHB to PLL6 on sun5+i.
I have a clock driver patch somewhere...
ChenYu
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list