[PATCH v6 6/6] wlcore: remove wl12xx_platform_data
Eliad Peller
eliad at wizery.com
Sun Mar 15 01:50:42 PDT 2015
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> wrote:
> * Eliad Peller <eliad at wizery.com> [150312 05:10]:
>> Now that we have wlcore device-tree bindings in place
>> (for both wl12xx and wl18xx), remove the legacy
>> wl12xx_platform_data struct, and move its members
>> into the platform device data (that is passed to wlcore)
>>
>> Davinci 850 is the only platform that still set
>> the platform data in the legacy way (and doesn't
>> have DT bindings), so remove the relevant
>> code/Kconfig option from the board file (as suggested
>> by Sekhar Nori)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Luciano Coelho <luca at coelho.fi>
>> Signed-off-by: Eliad Peller <eliad at wizery.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/Kconfig | 11 ---
>> arch/arm/mach-davinci/board-da850-evm.c | 113 -------------------------
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wilink_platform_data.c | 25 ------
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wl12xx/main.c | 19 ++---
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/boot.c | 1 -
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/sdio.c | 75 +++++-----------
>> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/wlcore_i.h | 8 +-
>> include/linux/wl12xx.h | 25 ------
>> 9 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 245 deletions(-)
>
> I got a build error related to the SPI driver with this series, probably
> need to update this patch:
>
> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/spi.c: In function ‘wl1271_probe’:
> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/spi.c:334:11: error: ‘struct wlcore_platdev_data’ has no member named ‘pdata’
> pdev_data.pdata = dev_get_platdata(&spi->dev);
> ^
> drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/spi.c:335:16: error: ‘struct wlcore_platdev_data’ has no member named ‘pdata’
> if (!pdev_data.pdata) {
>
yeah, i missed it :/
looks like there's no platform that defines platform data for it.
i'll replace the dev_get_platdata() with a function that only parses
the clock-frequency properties (the irq is taken in this case from the
spi_device).
(or maybe i should just drop it, as no one actually uses it?)
thanks,
Eliad.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list