[PATCH v6 2/6] wl12xx: use frequency instead of enumerations for pdata clocks

Eliad Peller eliad at wizery.com
Sun Mar 15 01:43:35 PDT 2015


On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 5:00 PM, Tony Lindgren <tony at atomide.com> wrote:
> * Eliad Peller <eliad at wizery.com> [150312 05:09]:
>> From: Luciano Coelho <luca at coelho.fi>
>> Instead of defining an enumeration with the FW specific values for the
>> different clock rates, use the actual frequency instead.  Also add a
>> boolean to specify whether the clock is XTAL or not.
> Thanks for doing this. Just one comment on how we're going to get this
> all merged. Chances are this will cause merge conflicts between the
> wireless tree and the omap tree for the platform data and dts changes.
> Can you please separate the wireless changes in this series so we can
> do this in the following sets:
> 1. Add support for new things to wireless driver
> 2. Switch platform code to use the new support
> 3. Remove support for platform data with a follow-up patch
the series will still be dependent on each other (e.g. (3) must come
only after (2) was applied), so i'm not sure that will be very

> The other option would be to have the whole series in a immutable
> branch against v3.0-rc1 that can be merged into both wirelss tree
> and omap tree.
i think that could be easier.

or maybe you can just take them all through the omap tree? the wlcore
tree is not under active development, so i don't expect conflicts


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list