[FOR DISCUSSION 0/9] Dove PMU support
arnd at arndb.de
Fri Mar 13 05:26:17 PDT 2015
On Friday 13 March 2015 12:11:27 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 12:57:11PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > On Thursday 12 March 2015 18:30:21 Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/soc/dove/pmu.txt | 49 +++
> > > arch/arm/boot/dts/dove.dtsi | 25 ++
> > > arch/arm/mach-mvebu/Kconfig | 1 +
> > > drivers/base/platform.c | 2 +
> > > drivers/base/power/common.c | 15 +
> > > drivers/base/power/domain.c | 33 +-
> > > drivers/soc/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/soc/dove/Makefile | 1 +
> > > drivers/soc/dove/pmu.c | 399 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > > include/linux/pm.h | 1 +
> > > include/linux/pm_domain.h | 4 +
> > > include/linux/soc/dove/pmu.h | 6 +
> > > 12 files changed, 532 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > I see add the header file and the global dove_init_pmu() function,
> > but I don't see a caller of that function. Is that intentional, or
> > did you accidentally leave out another patch that you meant to include?
> I kind'a did - it needs an explicit call from arch/arm/mach-mvebu/dove.c
> which I haven't added even in my tree (because I don't use that path,
> even when I test DT booting - I still use most of the arch/arm/mach-dove
> code when DT booting.) I'll add that now.
> Of course, I also have a patch which adds legacy support to
> arch/arm/mach-dove, but I've assumed you're not interested in that...
You mean legacy support in mach-mvebu?
I don't mind that at all, it was the mvebu maintainers that decided
it would be best to combine the multiplatform and DT work in order
to simplify both. I've also sent a patch set that moves mach-dove
into multiplatform, which is a different way of doing the same thing.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel