[PATCH v6 20/30] sparc/PCI: Use pci_scan_host_bridge() for simplicity

[Yijing Wang]

>> @@ -667,22 +680,21 @@ struct pci_bus *pci_scan_one_pbm(struct pci_pbm_info *pbm,
>>  	pbm->busn.end	= pbm->pci_last_busno;
>>  	pbm->busn.flags	= IORESOURCE_BUS;
>>  	pci_add_resource(&resources, &pbm->busn);
>> -	bus = pci_create_root_bus(parent,
>> +	host = pci_scan_host_bridge(parent,
>>  			PCI_DOMBUS(pbm->index, pbm->pci_first_busno),
>> -			pbm->pci_ops, pbm, &resources);
>> -	if (!bus) {
>> -		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create bus for %s\n",
>> +			pbm->pci_ops, pbm, &resources, &phb_ops);
>> +	if (!host) {
>> +		printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to create host bridge for %s\n",
>>  		       node->full_name);
>>  		pci_free_resource_list(&resources);
>>  		return NULL;
>>  	}
>>  
> 
> I would keep "bus" and set it here:
> 
> 	bus = host->bus;
> 
> That would remove some lines from your patch that really didn't change,
> which makes it easier to see what actually *is* changing, namely, you're
> removing the pci_of_scan_bus() call because it is now done inside
> pci_scan_host_bridge().
> 

Yes, keep it will make the code more clean, thanks!

>> -	pci_of_scan_bus(pbm, node, bus);
>> -	pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(bus);
>> +	pci_bus_register_of_sysfs(host->bus);
>>  
>> -	pci_claim_bus_resources(bus);
>> -	pci_bus_add_devices(bus);
>> -	return bus;
>> +	pci_claim_bus_resources(host->bus);
>> +	pci_bus_add_devices(host->bus);
>> +	return host->bus;
>>  }
>>  
>>  void pcibios_fixup_bus(struct pci_bus *pbus)
>> -- 
>> 1.7.1
>>
> 
> .
> 


-- 
Thanks!
Yijing