[PATCH] cpuidle: mvebu: update cpuidle thresholds for Armada XP SOCs

Andrew Lunn andrew at lunn.ch
Tue Mar 10 11:42:02 PDT 2015

On Tue, Mar 10, 2015 at 07:35:19PM +0100, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
> On 03/10/2015 07:05 PM, Thomas Petazzoni wrote:
> >Hello Daniel,
> >
> >I know you suggested a more rigorous method of determining the exit
> >latency and target residency times, but would it be nonetheless
> >possible to apply this patch, which clearly improves performance a lot,
> >and actually makes the code match the values used in the vendor kernel?
> >
> >I also think this patch should be marked for stable, it fixes values
> >introduced in commit b858fbc1919720f7f54360098ece03b383e961fa, and
> >should therefore be backported all the way to v3.16.
> I don't have a problem to apply this patch. But I would like to have
> confirmation from one of the Armada maintainers the tradeoff is
> accepted (less energy saving for more performance).

Hi Daniel

I believe Gregory has already acked this patch. Or do you want a 
explicit Acked-and-tradeoff-accepted-by: 


More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list