[PATCH 05/15] musb: Do not use musb_read[b|w] / _write[b|w] wrappers in generic fifo functions

[Hans de Goede]

Hi,

On 10-03-15 09:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tuesday 10 March 2015 08:43:22 Hans de Goede wrote:
>> On 09-03-15 22:50, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Monday 09 March 2015 21:40:18 Hans de Goede wrote:
>>>> The generic fifo functions already use non wrapped accesses in various
>>>> cases through the iowrite#_rep functions, and all platforms which override
>>>> the default musb_read[b|w] / _write[b|w] functions also provide their own
>>>> fifo access functions, so we can safely drop the unnecessary indirection
>>>> from the fifo access functions.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede at redhat.com>
>>>>
>>>
>>> The patch looks reasonably, but the description seem misleading.
>>> I believe the real reason why it's ok to use __raw_writew for the
>>> FIFO is that a FIFO by definition is using CPU endian access for
>>> copying byte streams from memory, which is unlike any other MMIO
>>> register that requires fixed-endian accessors.
>>
>> I'm not sure that that is the case here, this fifo allows reading
>> 4 bytes at a time using 32 bit word access, so endianness may come
>> into play. This patch is safe however since all existing users of
>> the generic fifo_read / write helpers which this patch touches, are
>> also using the generic musb_read[b|w] / _write[b|w] functions which
>> are just __raw_foo wrappers, so there is no functional change, which
>> is what the commit message tries to say.
>
> This probably means that the generic musb helpers are not safe to use
> on big-endian ARM systems (but may work on MIPS). The only one currently
> not using the generic helpers is blackfin, which is fixed to little
> endian.
>
>> Note that sunxi needs this function because of the register address
>> translation the sunxi_musb_readb / writeb wrappers are doing which
>> does not know how to deal with fifo data, and besides that it should
>> make the generic read / write fifo helpers somewhat faster by removing
>> an indirect function call.
>
> Your sunxi_musb_readw/writew functions however also are endian-safe
> and seem to get this part right, unlike all other platforms that use
> the generic __raw_*() accessors. With this patch applied, it should
> actually work fine, and it would work on other platforms as well
> if we change all __raw_*() calls outside of musb_default_write_fifo()
> and musb_default_read_fifo() to use *_relaxed() instead.

I think that that change falls outside of the scope of this patchset.

I agree that it would be probably a good idea to get rid of the
__raw_foo usage in musb, which is why I've used the non __raw
versions in the sunxi glue, but as said I believe this falls outside
of the scope of this patchset. All my preparation patches for adding
sunxi support carefully do not make any functional changes, as I
do not want to cause regressions on hardware which I cannot test.

Regards,

Hans