[PATCH] pinctrl: dt: at91: new binding
Alexandre Belloni
alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com
Fri Mar 6 09:07:08 PST 2015
On 07/03/2015 at 00:49:55 +0800, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote :
> >
> > Sorry but NACK.
> >
> > I don't want to manage another flavor of the pinmux biding with no real
> > benefit. I would have been good if we had it from day-1. Now it's too late.
>
> yes we do, we catch but a compiling time instead of RUNTIME which is critical
>
> so I’ll pass on the NACK
>
If you are changing the binding, how about doing it right this time and
completely drop the current mess?
> >
> > Moreover, splitting a binding definition if you have a function given by
> > multiple banks can be weird and not well understood in regard to our
> > current group+function definition scheme (Cf. your last example).
> >
>
> Others already do so and this is not complex at all
>
--
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list