[GIT PULL 2/2] Samsung fixes-2 for v4.0

Kukjin Kim kgene at kernel.org
Fri Mar 6 02:16:53 PST 2015


Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> 
+ Eduardo

Hi Arnd,

> On Tuesday 03 March 2015 04:00:14 Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > Please pull Samsung tmu and hdmi regression fixes for v4.0 and I know
> > this is quite big for fixes but I couldn't handle this series for
> > previous merge window because of dependency with driver side...sorry for
> > that and please pull so that we could support them in v4.0 on exynos
> > platforms.
> 
> What kind of dependency do you have there? It really should not be
> necessary to wait for driver changes, unless you do an incompatible
> DT binding change, which you should avoid.
> 
For TMU patches, I've asked Eduardo to provide topic branch for
'include/dt-bindings/thermal/thermal_exynos.h' has been added via thermal tree
because if I can't apply the patch in Samsung tree for arm-soc, kernel build
breakage will be happened. But I couldn't get Eduardo's topic branch.

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg41877.html


For HDMI patches, I thought the DT changes have a dependency with "drm/exynos:
add support for 'hdmi' clock" so waited for its applying then in drm tree. But
I couldn't send it to arm-soc after that...

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42173.html


I asked about the situation (late DT changes?) when I sent a pull-request, then
I couldn't get a access my kernel.org because of biz. trip to China :(

http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-samsung-soc/msg42235.html


> I've pulled it into fixes, but won't forward it until I hear a
> good explanation.
> 
As you know, basically I tried to make a clear branch for pull-request but in
that case, I couldn't find a solution. Sorry for the inconvenience.

I hope v4.0 can support them properly.

Thanks,
Kukjin




More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list