[PATCH 1/4] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_hwmod: Introduce ti,no-init dt property

[Tony Lindgren]

* Dave Gerlach <d-gerlach at ti.com> [150305 11:53]:
> On 03/05/2015 12:49 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> > * Paul Walmsley <paul at pwsan.com> [150305 10:16]:
> >> On Thu, 5 Mar 2015, Dave Gerlach wrote:
> >>
> >>> Introduce a dt property, ti,no-init, that prevents hwmod initialization.
> >>> Even if a dt node is marked as disabled, hwmod still at least enables
> >>> the hwmod and programs the sysconfig before attempting to idle it at
> >>> boot. If an IP has been disabled by the hardware configuration on a
> >>> platform, this will cause a hang due to writing to inactive registers.
> >>> This property prevents that from happening by marking the hwmod as
> >>> _HWMOD_STATE_DISABLED during init.
> >>
> >> I'm kind of wondering if hwmod should even touch a device if it's marked 
> >> as disabled in the DT.  Tony, what do you think?
> > 
> > Well nothing happens if a device is status = "disabled". No dev entry
> > gets created for it at all and hwmod won't have any data for the device
> > populated. The only way hwmod code could see that device if the device
> > gets it's data from the legacy omap_hwmod_*_data.c instead of DT.
> > 
> 
> We still need this for the sysconfig programming, correct? hwmod programs that
> regardless of dt status and then idles the IP,

Well hwmod does not even know about the IP IO addresses if it's marked
with status = "disabled".. Which IP are you having problems with?

> which is why I needed the ti,no-init for the epos evm. It isn't just a
> matter of we shouldnt write to it because we don't want to use it; we
> can't write to it because the module is held off so it causes an
> external abort if we do.

Well hard to say not knowing which module this is.. Pretty much all
the modules have drivers and the driver just does pm_runtime_get()
on it?

Regards,

Tony