[PATCH 0/6] Add support for QCOM GDSCs
Stanimir Varbanov
svarbanov at mm-sol.com
Thu Mar 5 08:55:40 PST 2015
On 03/02/2015 09:02 AM, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> GDSCs (Global Distributed Switch Controllers) control switches
> that supply power to an on-chip power domain and hence can be
> programmed in SW to safely power collapse and restore power to the
> respective PDs. They are part of a considerable number of recent QCOM
> SoCs (This series adds support for msm8974, msm8916 and apq8084 devices)
> and are part of the Clock control block.
>
> The series implements support for GDSC using the genpd framework
> modelling these as SW controllable power domains.
>
> 8916 support has a dependency on the Global Clock controller support [1]
> posted by Georgi Djakov.
>
> [1]
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/2/25/416
>
> Rajendra Nayak (3):
> clk: qcom: gdsc: Prepare common clk probe to register gdscs
> clk: qcom: gdsc: Add GDSCs in msm8916 GCC
> clk: qcom: gdsc: Add GDSCs in apq8084 GCC
>
> Stephen Boyd (3):
> clk: qcom: Add support for GDSCs
> clk: qcom: gdsc: Add GDSCs in msm8974 GCC
> clk: qcom: gdsc: Add GDSCs in msm8974 MMCC
>
> drivers/clk/qcom/Kconfig | 8 ++
> drivers/clk/qcom/Makefile | 1 +
> drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 27 +++++-
> drivers/clk/qcom/common.h | 2 +
> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-apq8084.c | 38 ++++++++
> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8916.c | 46 +++++++++
> drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8974.c | 14 +++
> drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c | 130 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h | 43 +++++++++
> drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8974.c | 54 +++++++++++
> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-apq8084.h | 6 ++
> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8916.h | 8 ++
> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,gcc-msm8974.h | 3 +
> include/dt-bindings/clock/qcom,mmcc-msm8974.h | 8 ++
> 14 files changed, 387 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.c
> create mode 100644 drivers/clk/qcom/gdsc.h
>
You missed a patch who adds appropriate changes in qcom,gcc.txt
(qcom,mmcc.txt), at least #power-domain-cells property should be described.
--
regards,
Stan
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list