[RFC PATCH 0/5] arm64: IOMMU-backed DMA mapping
robin.murphy at arm.com
Thu Mar 5 08:42:31 PST 2015
On 05/03/15 14:31, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
> On 2015-01-12 21:48, Robin Murphy wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> Whilst it's a long way off perfect, this has reached the point of being
>> functional and stable enough to be useful, so here it is. The core
>> consists of the meat of the arch/arm implementation modified to remove
>> the assumption of PAGE_SIZE pages and ported over to the Intel IOVA
>> allocator instead of the bitmap-based one. For that, this series depends
>> on my "Genericise the IOVA allocator" series posted earlier.
> I've tested your patches on Exynos 5433 based system and I have a few
> comments. To get them working I had to do some fixes. Most of them
> are already reported in this thread, the remaining I will send in a few
> Do you plan to send an updated patchset?
I already sent a v2 which addressed some of the major issues here:
Following some of the feedback there I've currently got a v3 in
development, which reworks a lot of it more in favour of scatterlists,
and fills in some of the gaps needed to move arch/arm over (I still need
to look at how to handle the drivers currently making use of
>> There are plenty of obvious things still to do, including:
>> * Domain and group handling is all wrong, but that's a bigger problem.
>> For the moment it does more or less the same thing as the arch/arm
>> code, which at least works for the one-IOMMU-per-device situation.
>> * IOMMU domains and IOVA domains probably want to be better integrated
>> with devices and each other, rather than having a proliferation of
>> arch-specific structs.
>> * The temporary map_sg implementation - I have a 'proper' iommu_map_sg
>> based one in progress, but since the simple one works it's not been
>> as high a priority.
> Well, for ARM arch this was the main feature of IOMMU and DMA-mapping
> integration. It is heavily used by some multimedia devices and dma-buf
> realted stuff to get a scattered buffer mapped into contiguous IO address
>> * Port arch/arm over to it. I'd guess it might be preferable to merge
>> this through arm64 first, though, rather than overcomplicate matters.
> I think that the code in arch/arm is already quite well tested and can be
> almost directly reused for common dma-mapping helpers.
>> * There may well be scope for streamlining and tidying up the copied
>> parts - In general I've simply avoided touching anything I don't
>> fully understand.
>> * In the same vein, I'm sure lots of it is fairly ARM-specific, so will
>> need longer-term work to become truly generic.
> Best regards
More information about the linux-arm-kernel