[PATCH] genirq: describe IRQF_COND_SUSPEND
mark.rutland at arm.com
Thu Mar 5 03:04:11 PST 2015
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:17:29PM +0000, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> tiny tiny nitpick:
> On 04/03/2015 at 20:00:40 +0000, Mark Rutland wrote :
> > With certain restrictions it is possible for a wakeup device to share
> > and IRQ with an IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user, and the warnings introduced by
> ^ an
Rafael, are you happy to fix that up, or would you like me to resend?
> > +In rare cases an IRQ can be shared between a wakeup device driver and an
> > +IRQF_NO_SUSPEND user. In order for this to be safe, the wakeup device driver
> > +must be able to discern spurious IRQs from genuine wakeup events (signalling
> And genuine question, should we use British English or American English
> or we don't care ?
Have I written something that isn't valid American English there? I read
over this a few times and failed to spot anything obvious.
I'm happy to change for consistency, I generally assume that's the most
More information about the linux-arm-kernel