[PATCH v9 01/21] ACPI / table: Use pr_debug() instead of pr_info() for MADT table scanning
Rafael J. Wysocki
rjw at rjwysocki.net
Wed Mar 4 14:33:32 PST 2015
On Wednesday, February 25, 2015 04:39:41 PM Hanjun Guo wrote:
> For a normal 8 cpu sockets system, it will up to 240 cpu threads (Xeon E7
> v2 family for now), and we need 240 entries for local apic or local x2apic
> in MADT table, so it will be much verbose information printed with a slow
> uart console when system booted, this will be even worse with large system
> with 16/32 cpu sockets.
>
> This patch just use pr_debug() instead of pr_info() for ioapic/iosapic,
> local apic/x2apic/sapic structures when scanning the MADT table to remove
> those verbose information, but leave other structures unchanged.
>
> CC: Rafael J Wysocki <rjw at rjwysocki.net>
> Signed-off-by: Hanjun Guo <hanjun.guo at linaro.org>
Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki at intel.com>
> ---
> drivers/acpi/tables.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++--------------
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/tables.c b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> index 93b8152..f4e5b88 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/tables.c
> @@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
> *
> */
>
> +/* Uncomment next line to get verbose printout */
> +/* #define DEBUG */
> #define pr_fmt(fmt) "ACPI: " fmt
>
> #include <linux/init.h>
> @@ -61,9 +63,9 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
> {
> struct acpi_madt_local_apic *p =
> (struct acpi_madt_local_apic *)header;
> - pr_info("LAPIC (acpi_id[0x%02x] lapic_id[0x%02x] %s)\n",
> - p->processor_id, p->id,
> - (p->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> + pr_debug("LAPIC (acpi_id[0x%02x] lapic_id[0x%02x] %s)\n",
> + p->processor_id, p->id,
> + (p->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> }
> break;
>
> @@ -71,9 +73,9 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
> {
> struct acpi_madt_local_x2apic *p =
> (struct acpi_madt_local_x2apic *)header;
> - pr_info("X2APIC (apic_id[0x%02x] uid[0x%02x] %s)\n",
> - p->local_apic_id, p->uid,
> - (p->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> + pr_debug("X2APIC (apic_id[0x%02x] uid[0x%02x] %s)\n",
> + p->local_apic_id, p->uid,
> + (p->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> }
> break;
>
> @@ -81,8 +83,8 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
> {
> struct acpi_madt_io_apic *p =
> (struct acpi_madt_io_apic *)header;
> - pr_info("IOAPIC (id[0x%02x] address[0x%08x] gsi_base[%d])\n",
> - p->id, p->address, p->global_irq_base);
> + pr_debug("IOAPIC (id[0x%02x] address[0x%08x] gsi_base[%d])\n",
> + p->id, p->address, p->global_irq_base);
> }
> break;
>
> @@ -155,9 +157,9 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
> {
> struct acpi_madt_io_sapic *p =
> (struct acpi_madt_io_sapic *)header;
> - pr_info("IOSAPIC (id[0x%x] address[%p] gsi_base[%d])\n",
> - p->id, (void *)(unsigned long)p->address,
> - p->global_irq_base);
> + pr_debug("IOSAPIC (id[0x%x] address[%p] gsi_base[%d])\n",
> + p->id, (void *)(unsigned long)p->address,
> + p->global_irq_base);
> }
> break;
>
> @@ -165,9 +167,9 @@ void acpi_table_print_madt_entry(struct acpi_subtable_header *header)
> {
> struct acpi_madt_local_sapic *p =
> (struct acpi_madt_local_sapic *)header;
> - pr_info("LSAPIC (acpi_id[0x%02x] lsapic_id[0x%02x] lsapic_eid[0x%02x] %s)\n",
> - p->processor_id, p->id, p->eid,
> - (p->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> + pr_debug("LSAPIC (acpi_id[0x%02x] lsapic_id[0x%02x] lsapic_eid[0x%02x] %s)\n",
> + p->processor_id, p->id, p->eid,
> + (p->lapic_flags & ACPI_MADT_ENABLED) ? "enabled" : "disabled");
> }
> break;
>
>
--
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list