[RFC PATCH 0/1] Wrong structure alignment due to compiler attribute "section"
sanfilippo
lsanfil at marvell.com
Wed Mar 4 03:40:34 PST 2015
On 03.03.2015 15:41, Dave Martin wrote:
Dave,
thanks for your response.
> For the element _size_ issue, I'm confused. On 32-bit, that
> structure is clearly 196 bytes in size, with the alignment requirement
> of void * (4 bytes)... so there's no clear reason why the linker
> shouldn't be inserting extra padding.
>
> I can't reproduce this with my current tools (upstream binutils-2.24,
> gcc-4.9.2).
>
>
> Can you try to track down where this discrepancy is coming from?
>
> i.e.,
>
> * If you're juggling with multiple kernel trees, make sure there
> are not differences between them that could be causing this, such
> as changes to linker scripts or header files that are involved
> in building these arrays.
I can reproduce this with a vanilla kernel (3.19) from kernel.org. What
I do is:
- configure the kernel with mvebu_v5_defconfig
- compile it
However this issue occurs (so far) only with this special toolchain:
http://www.plugcomputer.org/405/us/gplugd/tool-chain/arm-marvell-linux-gnueabi.tar.bz2
If you like you can try this yourself. I am sure that you will get the
same results.
I tried the same with three other toolchains but with those the problem
did not occur. I also tried other kernel configurations with that
"problematic" toolchain, but also the problem did not occur any more.
So I think its either a bug in that compiler/linker or the current
solution in vmlinux.lds.h does not work correct under some special
circumstances.
>
> * See what the input to the assembler looks like, with regard to
> .align directives.
>
> * See what the alignment of the affected sections is in each individual
> .o file.
Not sure what exactly I should check here. Could you be a bit more precise?
> * See what __alignof__(struct of_device_id) evaluates to.
It evaluates to "4" even for the bad case.
Regards,
Lino
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list