[PATCH] cpuidle: mvebu: Fix the CPU PM notifier usage

Fulvio fbf at libero.it
Tue Mar 3 02:52:53 PST 2015


Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
>
>
> On 03/03/2015 11:30, Daniel Lezcano wrote:
>   
>> On 02/27/2015 10:39 AM, Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>>     
>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>
>>> On 26/02/2015 22:55, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>>>       
>>>> On Thursday, February 26, 2015 06:20:48 PM Gregory CLEMENT wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> As stated in kernel/cpu_pm.c, "Platform is responsible for ensuring
>>>>> that cpu_pm_enter is not called twice on the same CPU before
>>>>> cpu_pm_exit is called.". In the current code in case of failure when
>>>>> calling mvebu_v7_cpu_suspend, the function cpu_pm_exit() is never
>>>>> called whereas cpu_pm_enter() was called just before.
>>>>>
>>>>> This patch moves the cpu_pm_exit() in order to balance the
>>>>> cpu_pm_enter() calls.
>>>>>
>>>>> Reported-by: Fulvio Benini <fbf at libero.it>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement at free-electrons.com>
>>>>>           
>>>> Should that go to "stable" too?  Which "stable" series it should go to if so?
>>>>         
>>> Yes as it fixes a potential issue, you're right it should go
>>> to "stable". The bug was here since the introduction of the driver
>>> in 3.16.
>>>       
>> Hi Gregory,
>>
>> actually the 'stable' rules state clearly:
>>
>> "- It must fix a real bug that bothers people (not a, "This could be a 
>> problem..." type thing)."
>>
>> You say "it fixes a potential issue", so no bug has been raise yet, right ?
>>     
>
> Indeed nobody claimed yet having a bug related to this issue.
>
> Gregory
>
>   
I reported the issue, but i cannot say if it's a real bug.
I had random kernel panics with a Netgear ReadyNAS RN102 (armada 370 cpu):
http://www.readynas.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=20&t=78697&sid=14747617286d55ac27296cdee7a3f420&start=210#p452214

All i can say is that the system use the "armadaxp_idle" driver and 
works fine when running "stress --cpu 8" in background.
I asked Netgear to provide a firmware without the idle driver to confirm 
if it's the cause of the problem, but they did not answered.
Bye,
Fulvio



More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list