[PATCH 1/8] iommu/arm-smmu: fix the assignment of log2size field
Will Deacon
will.deacon at arm.com
Mon Jun 29 10:05:18 PDT 2015
Hi Zhen Lei,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 09:32:57AM +0100, Zhen Lei wrote:
> Add a new local variable to store the value of log2size, so that it will
> not be overridden by L1 table size.
>
> Signed-off-by: Zhen Lei <thunder.leizhen at huawei.com>
> ---
> drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 14 +++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> index f141301..ba7fe2d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
> @@ -2021,19 +2021,19 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
> {
> void *strtab;
> u64 reg;
> - u32 size;
> + u32 size, log2size;
> int ret;
> struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
>
> /* Calculate the L1 size, capped to the SIDSIZE */
> - size = STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT - (ilog2(STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS) + 3);
> - size = min(size, smmu->sid_bits - STRTAB_SPLIT);
> - if (size + STRTAB_SPLIT < smmu->sid_bits)
> + log2size = STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT - (ilog2(STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS) + 3);
> + log2size = min(log2size, smmu->sid_bits - STRTAB_SPLIT);
> + if (log2size + STRTAB_SPLIT < smmu->sid_bits)
I still think this is wrong. LOG2SIZE should correspond to the whole
stream-table, not just the first level. How about the (totally untested)
patch below, instead?
Will
--->8
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
index 8e9ec81ce4bb..1942a45f68b2 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c
@@ -2020,21 +2020,23 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
{
void *strtab;
u64 reg;
- u32 size;
+ u32 size, l1size;
int ret;
struct arm_smmu_strtab_cfg *cfg = &smmu->strtab_cfg;
/* Calculate the L1 size, capped to the SIDSIZE */
size = STRTAB_L1_SZ_SHIFT - (ilog2(STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS) + 3);
size = min(size, smmu->sid_bits - STRTAB_SPLIT);
- if (size + STRTAB_SPLIT < smmu->sid_bits)
+ cfg->num_l1_ents = 1 << size;
+
+ size += STRTAB_SPLIT;
+ if (size < smmu->sid_bits)
dev_warn(smmu->dev,
"2-level strtab only covers %u/%u bits of SID\n",
- size + STRTAB_SPLIT, smmu->sid_bits);
+ size, smmu->sid_bits);
- cfg->num_l1_ents = 1 << size;
- size = cfg->num_l1_ents * (STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
- strtab = dma_zalloc_coherent(smmu->dev, size, &cfg->strtab_dma,
+ l1size = cfg->num_l1_ents * (STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3);
+ strtab = dma_zalloc_coherent(smmu->dev, l1size, &cfg->strtab_dma,
GFP_KERNEL);
if (!strtab) {
dev_err(smmu->dev,
@@ -2055,8 +2057,7 @@ static int arm_smmu_init_strtab_2lvl(struct arm_smmu_device *smmu)
ret = arm_smmu_init_l1_strtab(smmu);
if (ret)
dma_free_coherent(smmu->dev,
- cfg->num_l1_ents *
- (STRTAB_L1_DESC_DWORDS << 3),
+ l1size,
strtab,
cfg->strtab_dma);
return ret;
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list