[PATCH-v4 1/3] mfd: 88pm800: Add device tree support

[Vaibhav Hiremath]

On Thursday 25 June 2015 03:49 PM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jun 2015, Vaibhav Hiremath wrote:
>
>> Add DT support to the 88pm800 driver, along with compatible
>> field for it's sub-devices (rtc, onkey and regulator)
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chao Xie <chao.xie at marvell.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Vaibhav Hiremath <vaibhav.hiremath at linaro.org>
>> ---
>>   drivers/mfd/88pm800.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
>> index 841717a..40fd014 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mfd/88pm800.c
>> @@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/mfd/core.h>
>>   #include <linux/mfd/88pm80x.h>
>>   #include <linux/slab.h>
>> +#include <linux/of_device.h>
>>
>>   /* Interrupt Registers */
>>   #define PM800_INT_STATUS1		(0x05)
>> @@ -121,6 +122,11 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id pm80x_id_table[] = {
>>   };
>>   MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, pm80x_id_table);
>>
>> +static const struct of_device_id pm80x_of_match_table[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "marvell,88pm800", },
>> +	{},
>> +};
>> +
>>   static struct resource rtc_resources[] = {
>>   	{
>>   	 .name = "88pm80x-rtc",
>> @@ -133,6 +139,7 @@ static struct resource rtc_resources[] = {
>>   static struct mfd_cell rtc_devs[] = {
>>   	{
>>   	 .name = "88pm80x-rtc",
>> +	 .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm80x-rtc",
>>   	 .num_resources = ARRAY_SIZE(rtc_resources),
>>   	 .resources = &rtc_resources[0],
>>   	 .id = -1,
>> @@ -151,6 +158,7 @@ static struct resource onkey_resources[] = {
>>   static const struct mfd_cell onkey_devs[] = {
>>   	{
>>   	 .name = "88pm80x-onkey",
>> +	 .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm80x-onkey",
>>   	 .num_resources = 1,
>>   	 .resources = &onkey_resources[0],
>>   	 .id = -1,
>> @@ -160,6 +168,7 @@ static const struct mfd_cell onkey_devs[] = {
>>   static const struct mfd_cell regulator_devs[] = {
>>   	{
>>   	 .name = "88pm80x-regulator",
>> +	 .of_compatible = "marvell,88pm80x-regulator",
>>   	 .id = -1,
>>   	},
>>   };
>> @@ -544,8 +553,21 @@ static int pm800_probe(struct i2c_client *client,
>>   	int ret = 0;
>>   	struct pm80x_chip *chip;
>>   	struct pm80x_platform_data *pdata = dev_get_platdata(&client->dev);
>> +	struct device_node *np = client->dev.of_node;
>>   	struct pm80x_subchip *subchip;
>>
>> +	if (!pdata && !np) {
>> +		dev_err(&client->dev,
>> +			"pm80x requires platform data or of_node\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (!pdata) {
>> +		pdata = devm_kzalloc(&client->dev, sizeof(*pdata), GFP_KERNEL);
>> +		if (!pdata)
>> +			return -ENOMEM;
>> +	}
>
> Why have you allocated data for pdata, then done nothing with it?
>

Not in this patch, but subsequent patches would use it.

Thanks,
Vaibhav