[RFC PATCH v6 2/2] nvmem: Add Vybrid OCOTP and OCROM support
Srinivas Kandagatla
srinivas.kandagatla at linaro.org
Wed Jun 24 02:34:43 PDT 2015
On 24/06/15 09:35, Maxime Ripard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 07:14:57PM +0530, Sanchayan Maity wrote:
>> +static struct nvmem_config ocotp_config = {
>> + .name = "soc_id",
>> +};
>> +
>> +static struct nvmem_config rom_config = {
>> + .name = "rom_rev",
>> +};
>
> Srinivas, shouldn't we use the DT to setup these names, just like
> clock-output-names does for example?
These are the provider names, which would not change per board, I think. :-)
On the other hand if we are going to use generic drivers like
"simple-mmio-nvmem" then having name DT bindings makes sense.
IMO, clock-output-names are analogous to nvmem consumers, which are
obviously getting there names from cell node name ATM.
>
> This is very likely to change from one board to another, and defining
> a new compatible and/or driver for each board seems a bit fishy.
>
Do you have any particular example in mind, where the provider names
would change per board?
--srini
> Maxime
>
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list