[PATCH v4 1/2] mtd: nand: sunxi: Replace failsafe timing cfg with calculated value
Brian Norris
computersforpeace at gmail.com
Tue Jun 23 16:30:03 PDT 2015
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:57:16PM +0200, Roy Spliet wrote:
> The TIMING_CFG register was previously statically set to a magic value
> (extracted from Allwinner's BSP) when initializing the NAND controller.
> Now that we have more details about the TIMING_CFG register layout
> (extracted from the A83 user manual) we can dynamically calculate the
> appropriate value for each NAND chip and set it when selecting the
> chip.
>
> Signed-off-by: Roy Spliet <r.spliet at ultimaker.com>
>
> V2:
> - Fix crippled comments
>
> V3:
> - Warn for invalid timings
> - Style
>
> V4:
> - Make better use of return types
> - Style and comments
> - Remove superfluous initialisation
You've got some checkpatch issues. The first one is not quite right, but the
second is.
ERROR:MULTISTATEMENT_MACRO_USE_DO_WHILE: Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in a do - while loop
#42: FILE: drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c:103:
+#define NFC_TIMING_CFG(tWB, tADL, tWHR, tRHW, tCAD) \
+ ((tWB) & 0x3) | (((tADL) & 0x3) << 2) | \
+ (((tWHR) & 0x3) << 4) | (((tRHW) & 0x3) << 6) | \
+ (((tCAD) & 0x7) << 8);
WARNING:TRAILING_SEMICOLON: macros should not use a trailing semicolon
#42: FILE: drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c:103:
+#define NFC_TIMING_CFG(tWB, tADL, tWHR, tRHW, tCAD) \
+ ((tWB) & 0x3) | (((tADL) & 0x3) << 2) | \
+ (((tWHR) & 0x3) << 4) | (((tRHW) & 0x3) << 6) | \
+ (((tCAD) & 0x7) << 8);
ERROR:SPACING: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
#97: FILE: drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c:838:
+#define sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(l,p,c) \
^
ERROR:SPACING: space required after that ',' (ctx:VxV)
#97: FILE: drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c:838:
+#define sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(l,p,c) \
^
total: 3 errors, 1 warnings, 128 lines checked
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c | 74 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 69 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c
> index 6f93b29..79de4ef 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c
> @@ -99,6 +99,13 @@
> NFC_CMD_INT_ENABLE | \
> NFC_DMA_INT_ENABLE)
>
> +/* define NFC_TIMING_CFG register layout */
> +#define NFC_TIMING_CFG(tWB, tADL, tWHR, tRHW, tCAD) \
> + ((tWB) & 0x3) | (((tADL) & 0x3) << 2) | \
> + (((tWHR) & 0x3) << 4) | (((tRHW) & 0x3) << 6) | \
> + (((tCAD) & 0x7) << 8);
checkpatch didn't like this for other reasons (which you should also address),
but it didn't point out the fact that you need some parentheses around the
whole expression here, so you don't get weird results for things like:
foo = NFC_TIMING_CFG(a, b, c, d, e) & bar;
> +
> +
> /* define bit use in NFC_CMD */
> #define NFC_CMD_LOW_BYTE GENMASK(7, 0)
> #define NFC_CMD_HIGH_BYTE GENMASK(15, 8)
> @@ -208,6 +215,7 @@ struct sunxi_nand_hw_ecc {
> * @nand: base NAND chip structure
> * @mtd: base MTD structure
> * @clk_rate: clk_rate required for this NAND chip
> + * @timing_cfg TIMING_CFG register value for this NAND chip
> * @selected: current active CS
> * @nsels: number of CS lines required by the NAND chip
> * @sels: array of CS lines descriptions
> @@ -217,6 +225,7 @@ struct sunxi_nand_chip {
> struct nand_chip nand;
> struct mtd_info mtd;
> unsigned long clk_rate;
> + u32 timing_cfg;
> int selected;
> int nsels;
> struct sunxi_nand_chip_sel sels[0];
> @@ -403,6 +412,7 @@ static void sunxi_nfc_select_chip(struct mtd_info *mtd, int chip)
> }
> }
>
> + writel(sunxi_nand->timing_cfg, nfc->regs + NFC_REG_TIMING_CFG);
> writel(ctl, nfc->regs + NFC_REG_CTL);
>
> sunxi_nand->selected = chip;
> @@ -807,10 +817,33 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_hw_syndrome_ecc_write_page(struct mtd_info *mtd,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static const s32 tWB_lut[] = {6, 12, 16, 20};
> +static const s32 tRHW_lut[] = {4, 8, 12, 20};
> +
> +static int _sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(const s32 *lut, int lut_size, u32 duration,
> + u32 clk_period)
> +{
> + u32 clk_cycles = DIV_ROUND_UP(duration, clk_period);
> + int i;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < lut_size; i++) {
> + if (clk_cycles <= lut[i])
> + return i;
> + }
> +
> + /* Doesn't fit */
> + return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
> +#define sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(l,p,c) \
> + _sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(l, ARRAY_SIZE(l), p, c)
> +
> static int sunxi_nand_chip_set_timings(struct sunxi_nand_chip *chip,
> const struct nand_sdr_timings *timings)
> {
> + struct sunxi_nfc *nfc = to_sunxi_nfc(chip->nand.controller);
> u32 min_clk_period = 0;
> + u32 tWB, tADL, tWHR, tRHW, tCAD;
>
> /* T1 <=> tCLS */
> if (timings->tCLS_min > min_clk_period)
> @@ -872,6 +905,41 @@ static int sunxi_nand_chip_set_timings(struct sunxi_nand_chip *chip,
> if (timings->tWC_min > (min_clk_period * 2))
> min_clk_period = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tWC_min, 2);
>
> + /* T16 - T19 + tCAD */
> + tWB = sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(tWB_lut, timings->tWB_max,
> + min_clk_period);
> + if (tWB < 0) {
smatch and gcc complain:
drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c: In function ‘sunxi_nand_chip_set_timings’:
drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c:916:2: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (tWB < 0) {
^
drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c:916 sunxi_nand_chip_set_timings() warn: unsigned 'tWB' is never less than zero. [smatch]
> + dev_err(nfc->dev, "unsupported tWB\n");
> + return tWB;
> + }
> +
> + tADL = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tADL_min, min_clk_period) >> 3;
> + if (tADL > 3) {
> + dev_err(nfc->dev, "unsupported tADL\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + tWHR = DIV_ROUND_UP(timings->tWHR_min, min_clk_period) >> 3;
> + if (tWHR > 3) {
> + dev_err(nfc->dev, "unsupported tWHR\n");
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> +
> + tRHW = sunxi_nand_lookup_timing(tRHW_lut, timings->tRHW_min,
> + min_clk_period);
> + if (tRHW < 0) {
smatch and gcc compalin:
drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c:935 sunxi_nand_chip_set_timings() warn: unsigned 'tRHW' is never less than zero. [smatch]
drivers/mtd/nand/sunxi_nand.c:935:2: warning: comparison of unsigned expression < 0 is always false [-Wtype-limits]
if (tRHW < 0) {
^
> + dev_err(nfc->dev, "unsupported tRHW\n");
> + return tRHW;
> + }
> +
> + /*
> + * TODO: according to ONFI specs this value only applies for DDR NAND,
> + * but Allwinner seems to set this to 0x7. Mimic them for now.
> + */
> + tCAD = 0x7;
> +
> + /* TODO: A83 has some more bits for CDQSS, CS, CLHZ, CCS, WC */
> + chip->timing_cfg = NFC_TIMING_CFG(tWB, tADL, tWHR, tRHW, tCAD);
>
> /* Convert min_clk_period from picoseconds to nanoseconds */
> min_clk_period = DIV_ROUND_UP(min_clk_period, 1000);
> @@ -884,8 +952,6 @@ static int sunxi_nand_chip_set_timings(struct sunxi_nand_chip *chip,
> */
> chip->clk_rate = (2 * NSEC_PER_SEC) / min_clk_period;
>
> - /* TODO: configure T16-T19 */
> -
> return 0;
> }
>
> @@ -1377,11 +1443,9 @@ static int sunxi_nfc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> platform_set_drvdata(pdev, nfc);
>
> /*
> - * TODO: replace these magic values with proper flags as soon as we
> - * know what they are encoding.
> + * TODO: replace this magic value with EDO flag
> */
> writel(0x100, nfc->regs + NFC_REG_TIMING_CTL);
> - writel(0x7ff, nfc->regs + NFC_REG_TIMING_CFG);
>
> ret = sunxi_nand_chips_init(dev, nfc);
> if (ret) {
Brian
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list