[PATCH 0/6] cpufreq: use generic cpufreq drivers forExynos4210platform

[Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz]

Hi,

Mike, could you please take a look at patches #1 and #2 (#1 is a 4 line
change to a Common Clock Framework and #2 is ARM Exynos specific)?

This series has been waiting on your feedback since 3rd of April. :(

Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics

On Thursday, June 04, 2015 08:22:05 AM Kukjin Kim wrote:
> On 05/14/15 22:07, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> > On 05/14/15 14:10, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> >> On 14-05-15, 13:07, Kukjin Kim wrote:
> >>> On 05/13/15 23:08, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi,
> >>>>
> >>> Hi Bart,
> >>>
> >>>> On Friday, April 03, 2015 06:43:43 PM Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> >>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> This patch series removes the use of Exynos4210 specific support
> >>>>> from cpufreq-exynos driver and enables the use of cpufreq-dt driver
> >>>>> for this platform.
> >>>>
> >>>> Gentle Ping.  Mike/Kukjin/Viresh could you please review/ack relevant
> >>>> patches (patches #1-3 are for clock subsystem, patches #4-5 for Exynos
> >>>> mach/dts and patch #6 is for cpufreq subsystem)?
> >>
> >> Sorry I thought I already Acked an older version of this set and so
> >> didn't went for it again. Done now.
> >>
> >>> Yes, I totally agreed with this patches for arch side changes and this
> >>> approach when Thomas posted.
> >>>
> >>>> Also what is your
> >>>> preferred way to upstream them (patches are not independent so it would
> >>>> be best to merge them through one tree, otherwise synchronization of
> >>>> git pulls between different subsystem trees will be needed)?
> >>>>
> >>> I can provide topic branch for arch side changes even it is small. I
> >>> think once Viresh and Mike make each topic branch based on -rc or the
> >>> smallest changes from each subsystem then I could handle this series or
> >>> Viresh or Mike need to handle this series with merging each topic
> >>> branches in subsystem. I'm fine either way.
> >>>
> >>> Viresh and Mike, how do you think about that?
> >>
> >> For cpufreq subsystem changes, you can take them in your tree.
> >>
> > Hi Viresh, OK, I will take the cpufreq changes with your ack. Thanks for
> > your confirmation.
> > 
> > Hi Mike and Sylwester,
> > How can we handle this series well without any problems? hmm...
> > 
> Still I need to get clock guys' ack or any comments on this series...
> 
> - Kukjin
> 
> >>>> I'm still hoping that this patchset will make it into v4.2 as there are
> >>>> no known issues with it (except minor coding nit for patch #5)...
> >>>>
> >>> Sure, why not :-)