[PATCH 04/10] KVM: arm/arm64: vgic: Allow HW irq to be encoded in LR

[Marc Zyngier]

On 17/06/15 14:21, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 17 June 2015 at 12:53, Eric Auger <eric.auger at linaro.org> wrote:
>> shouldn't we test somewhere that the hwirq is between 16 and 1019.
> 
> Not directly related, but that reminds me that I noticed the
> other day that we have VGIC_MAX_IRQS = 1024 (and use that as a
> guard on how many irqs we let userspace configure and ask us
> to deliver), but that doesn't account for the couple of magic
> numbers at the top of the range. I think that lets userspace
> cause us to do UNPREDICTABLE things to the GIC...

Good point. How about the following:

diff --git a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
index 78fb820..950064a 100644
--- a/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
+++ b/virt/kvm/arm/vgic.c
@@ -1561,7 +1561,7 @@ int kvm_vgic_inject_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int cpuid, unsigned int irq_num,
 			goto out;
 	}
 
-	if (irq_num >= kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs)
+	if (irq_num >= min(kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs, 1020))
 		return -EINVAL;
 
 	vcpu_id = vgic_update_irq_pending(kvm, cpuid, irq_num, level);
@@ -2161,10 +2161,7 @@ int kvm_set_irq(struct kvm *kvm, int irq_source_id,
 
 	BUG_ON(!vgic_initialized(kvm));
 
-	if (spi > kvm->arch.vgic.nr_irqs)
-		return -EINVAL;
 	return kvm_vgic_inject_irq(kvm, 0, spi, level);
-
 }
 
 /* MSI not implemented yet */

Thanks,

	M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...