[PATCH] arm64: fix missing syscall trace exit
Josh Stone
jistone at redhat.com
Tue Jun 2 18:11:48 PDT 2015
On 06/02/2015 06:01 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> If a syscall is entered without TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE set, then it goes on
> the fast path. It's then possible to have TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE added in
> the middle of the syscall, but ret_fast_syscall doesn't check this flag
> again. This causes a ptrace syscall-exit-stop to be missed.
>
> For instance, from a PTRACE_EVENT_FORK reported during do_fork, the
> tracer might resume with PTRACE_SYSCALL, setting TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE.
> Now the completion of the fork should have a syscall-exit-stop.
>
> Russell King fixed this on arm by re-checking _TIF_SYSCALL_WORK in the
> fast exit path. Do the same on arm64.
>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas at arm.com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon at arm.com>
> Cc: Russell King <rmk at arm.linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Stone <jistone at redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> index 959fe8733560..a547a3e8a198 100644
> --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -608,7 +608,9 @@ ENDPROC(cpu_switch_to)
> */
> ret_fast_syscall:
> disable_irq // disable interrupts
> - ldr x1, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS]
> + ldr x1, [tsk, #TI_FLAGS] // re-check for syscall tracing
> + and x2, x1, #_TIF_SYSCALL_WORK
> + cbnz x2, __sys_trace_return
> and x2, x1, #_TIF_WORK_MASK
> cbnz x2, fast_work_pending
> enable_step_tsk x1, x2
I do have one concern about this, also in Russell's ARM patch. Is it
really ok to branch to __sys_trace_return with interrupts disabled?
I didn't hit any issue from that, but my testcase only exercises this
path once each run. So that might have just been lucky not to hit any
gross scenario...
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list