[PATCH V6 1/3] OPP: Add new bindings to address shortcomings of existing bindings

[Mark Brown]

On Tue, Jun 02, 2015 at 11:31:20AM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/28, Viresh Kumar wrote:

> > +			opp-supply = <&cpu_supply0>;

> opp-supply isn't mentioned anywhere. Is that intentional? Is it
> supposed to be cpu-supply still? It isn't clear to me from the

I'm also a bit worried about the naming here - regulator supplies should
always reflect the name of the supply in the hardware and it seems
unlikely that this is one.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 473 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.infradead.org/pipermail/linux-arm-kernel/attachments/20150602/a90a37b2/attachment.sig>