[PATCH 16/16] ARM: at91/dt: Add Acme Arietta G25
Sergio Tanzilli
tanzilli at acmesystems.it
Mon Jun 1 09:26:42 PDT 2015
Hi Nicolas
at91-ariettag25.dtb is ok for me. I'll change the name on DT generator.
at91-ariettag25.dtb is better than at91-arietta.dtb because probably
we'll exit with different Atmel cpu on arietta very soon
thanks
Sergio
On 1 June 2015 at 18:18, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com> wrote:
> Le 29/05/2015 19:47, Alexandre Belloni a écrit :
>> Add a minimum Device Tree for Acme Arietta G25.
>> http://acme.systems/arietta
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com>
>> Cc: Sergio Tanzilli <tanzilli at acmesystems.it>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile | 1 +
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-acme-arietta.dts | 75 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>> 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+)
>> create mode 100644 arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-acme-arietta.dts
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>> index 8c3da289a00b..96a169e6ea56 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/Makefile
>> @@ -31,6 +31,7 @@ dtb-$(CONFIG_SOC_SAM_V4_V5) += \
>> at91sam9n12ek.dtb \
>> at91sam9rlek.dtb \
>> at91-ariag25.dtb \
>> + at91-acme-arietta.dtb \
>
> Do you want to have the additional vendor name here? We already have 2
> boards by ACME and they don't have this type of name:
> at91-foxg20.dtb
> at91-ariag25.dtb
>
> So I'd prefer to use "at91-arietta.dtb" or "at91-ariettag25.dtb" or any
> kind or variant from these ones... I know it may come from the ACME DT
> generator tool, but it could be strange at first sight.
>
> Sergio, do you have an opinion? In relation with eventual future
> products, which is your preferred name?
>
>
>> at91-cosino_mega2560.dtb \
>> at91-kizboxmini.dtb \
>> at91sam9g15ek.dtb \
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-acme-arietta.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-acme-arietta.dts
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 000000000000..142d588ad6bf
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/at91-acme-arietta.dts
>> @@ -0,0 +1,75 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Device Tree file for Arietta G25
>> + * This device tree is minimal, to activate more peripherals, see:
>> + * http://dts.acmesystems.it/arietta/
>
> Yes, absolutely: link to the DT generator is a big plus here.
>
>
>> + */
>> +/dts-v1/;
>> +#include "at91sam9g25.dtsi"
>> +/ {
>> + model = "Acme Systems Arietta G25";
>> + compatible = "acme,ariettag25", "atmel,at91sam9x5", "atmel,at91sam9";
>> +
>
> Don't we need to add a "alias" group here, to be sure that the
> "stdout-path" is always good whatever appends to the underlying
> at91sam9g25.dtsi (nitpicking, I know ;-)) ?
>
>> + chosen {
>> + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
>> + };
>> +
>> + memory {
>> + reg = <0x20000000 0x8000000>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + clocks {
>> + slow_xtal {
>> + clock-frequency = <32768>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + main_xtal {
>> + clock-frequency = <12000000>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + ahb {
>> + apb {
>> + mmc0: mmc at f0008000 {
>> + pinctrl-0 = <
>> + &pinctrl_mmc0_slot0_clk_cmd_dat0
>> + &pinctrl_mmc0_slot0_dat1_3>;
>> + status = "okay";
>> +
>> + slot at 0 {
>> + reg = <0>;
>> + bus-width = <4>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + usb2: gadget at f803c000 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> +
>> + dbgu: serial at fffff200 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> +
>> + rtc at fffffeb0 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + usb0: ohci at 00600000 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + num-ports = <3>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + usb1: ehci at 00700000 {
>> + status = "okay";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +
>> + leds {
>> + compatible = "gpio-leds";
>> + arietta_led {
>> + label = "arietta_led";
>> + gpios = <&pioB 8 GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>; /* PB8 */
>> + linux,default-trigger = "heartbeat";
>> + };
>> + };
>> +};
>>
>
>
> --
> Nicolas Ferre
--
Sergio Tanzilli
tanzilli at acmesystems.it
Acme Systems srl
http://www.acmesystems.it
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list