[PATCH] ARM: dts: mvebu: add ethernet to the cm-a510 board

[David Goodenough]

On Friday 30 January 2015 14:07:55 Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> [Re-adding the most obvious People to Cc]
> 
> On 30.01.2015 13:44, David Goodenough wrote:
> > On Friday 30 January 2015 13:03:59 Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
> >> On 30.01.2015 12:41, Jean-Francois Moine wrote:
> >>> On Fri, 30 Jan 2015 12:00:16 +0100
> >> 
> >>> Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> That what dtsi's are made for with one exception: the dtsi cannot "run"
> >> on its own but needs at least one baseboard.dts that includes it. We
> >> could create a "bare"-baseboard that represents what is (easily)
> >> accessible on the SoM itself. Given the fact that even UART0 needs a
> >> baseboard that grabs it from the SoM connector, I see no value in that.
> >> 
> >>> In any case, any real cm-a510 board should work with the
> >>> generic/full .dts even if some hardware modules are lacking. No?
> >> 
> >> Nope. The cm-a510 is just an add-on for a baseboard, it does not make
> >> a working board. Just think of it as a feature-improved SoC.
> > 
> > This sounds like capes on the BeagleBoard.  Are these extension boards
> > self-identifying?  If so then the approach used with the capes might work
> > here too.
> 
> David,
> 
> IMHO capes are a different thing. The BB can run just fine without any
> cape installed, the cm-a510 cannot run without a baseboard. Also, once
> you have your SoM installed it cannot change over runtime, there is no
> need for any dynamic overlays and such.
> 
> You can build some 5 or 10 different configurations given the SoM and
> a specific baseboard but not hundreds of possible combinations.
> Besides, Gabriel is the first in almost 2 years that actually has an
> cm-a510 - so, I doubt we'll have to mainline dozens of baseboards
> using the cm-a510 in the near future.
> 
> Regarding the self-identification, it would be great if the actual SoM
> configuration would be stored in the (always available) SPI flash, but
> from my experience with the boards I have seen so far, I have a bad
> feeling about it ;) A quick look at the sb-a510 (the compulab baseboard
> for cm-a510) suggests that there is more configuration available but
> by jumpers that (hopefully) can be read out by GPIOs at least.
> 
> The best similar board available in mainline I can remember is the
> SolidRun Hummingboard, i.e. one baseboard that can be equipped with
> 3-4 different SoMs.
Ah this sounds like history repeating itself.  I have some old PC-104 
Compulab boards which had pluggable CPUs.  

They were x86 based, so DTS was not a question.  I guess that the
only approach is to start with the plugin, and then add the baseboard
as a standard include.

David
> 
> Sebastian
> 
> _______________________________________________
> linux-arm-kernel mailing list
> linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel