[GIT PULL] at91: cleanup/soc for 3.20 #4
Olof Johansson
olof at lixom.net
Thu Jan 29 15:06:12 PST 2015
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Alexandre Belloni
<alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29/01/2015 at 14:08:25 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote :
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 2:02 PM, Olof Johansson <olof at lixom.net> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 12:51:12PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>> >> Arnd, Olof, Kevin,
>> >>
>> >> This is a batch of cleanup/soc modifications that you may also stack on top of
>> >> your "soc" branch as the previous one.
>> >> It collects some more cleanup material and simplifies the AT91 boot code. Only
>> >> some little details remain before having a classical DT boot (without additional
>> >> mapping of registers for instance). This part will be addressed in 3.21.
>> >>
>> >> The switch to multi-platform is not included as it needs some patches in ASoC,
>> >> ata and arm-soc/next/drivers to be able to compile. I may send patches or a
>> >> pull-request that can be send to Linus late during the merge-window. Tell me
>> >> how you feel it can be done (or delayed to 3.21).
>> >>
>> >> The conflict related to the rename of board-dt-sama5.c => sama5.c is solved in
>> >> this branch:
>> >> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/nferre/linux-at91.git/log/?h=arm-soc-for-next%2bat91-3.20-cleanup
>> >>
>
> The conflict is fixed there ;)
This conflict will bubble all the way up to Linus. I wonder if it's
better to just include the fix as a base of this branch. Not merged on
top, but as a base. That'll be easiest of all.
Nicolas, can you respin with that as base? Since that fixes branch
from you is based on -rc1, it should work out quite well.
-Olof
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list