[PATCH 2/9] mtd: pxa3xx_nand: add a non mandatory ECC clock
Andrew Lunn
andrew at lunn.ch
Tue Jan 27 07:50:47 PST 2015
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 03:10:09PM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> Some controllers (as the coming Berlin nand controller) need to enable
> an ECC clock. Add support for this clock in the pxa3xx nand driver, and
> leave it as non mandatory.
Hi Antoine
It would be good to document this clock in the device tree binding.
> Signed-off-by: Antoine Tenart <antoine.tenart at free-electrons.com>
> ---
> drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c | 26 +++++++++++++++++++-------
> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> index d00ac392d1c4..2681ec4abafa 100644
> --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/pxa3xx_nand.c
> @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ struct pxa3xx_nand_info {
> struct nand_hw_control controller;
> struct platform_device *pdev;
>
> - struct clk *clk;
> + struct clk *clk, *ecc_clk;
> void __iomem *mmio_base;
> unsigned long mmio_phys;
> struct completion cmd_complete, dev_ready;
> @@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@ static int alloc_nand_resource(struct platform_device *pdev)
>
> spin_lock_init(&chip->controller->lock);
> init_waitqueue_head(&chip->controller->wq);
> - info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
> + info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "nfc");
Does this keep backwards compatibility? Not all the existing users
have there clocks named. What i think happens here is that
of_clk_get_by_name() calls of_property_match_string(np, "clock-names",
name); That returns -EINVAL, and then we ask of_clk_get() to get the
-EINVAL'th clock. I don't think that is going to end well.
I think you need to keep the NULL here, but should use "ecc" for the
second clock and require the use of the clock-names property when an
ecc clock is required.
Andrew
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list