[PATCH v3 08/13] pm: at91: the standby mode uses the same sram function as the suspend to memory mode
Yang, Wenyou
Wenyou.Yang at atmel.com
Tue Jan 27 02:11:00 PST 2015
Hi Sylvain,
Thanks a lot.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Sylvain Rochet [mailto:sylvain.rochet at finsecur.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 27, 2015 6:08 PM
> To: Yang, Wenyou
> Cc: Ferre, Nicolas; linux at arm.linux.org.uk; linux-arm-kernel at lists.infradead.org;
> linux-kernel at vger.kernel.org; alexandre.belloni at free-electrons.com;
> peda at axentia.se; sergei.shtylyov at cogentembedded.com; linux at maxim.org.za
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 08/13] pm: at91: the standby mode uses the same sram
> function as the suspend to memory mode
>
> Hello Wenyou,
>
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 01:58:20PM +0800, Wenyou Yang wrote:
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c index
> > 0377c0d..d967c31 100644
> > --- a/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-at91/pm.c
> > @@ -71,7 +71,7 @@ static int at91_pm_begin(suspend_state_t state)
> > * Verify that all the clocks are correct before entering
> > * slow-clock mode.
> > */
> > -static int at91_pm_verify_clocks(void)
> > +static int at91_pm_verify_clocks(suspend_state_t state)
> > {
> > unsigned long scsr;
> > int i;
> > @@ (...)
>
> Unused state argument, it was added in v2, this is just a trace of a reverted v2
> change not fully cleaned.
Yes, not clear.
>
>
> > + if (!at91_pm_verify_clocks(state))
> > + goto error;
>
> Ditto.
>
>
> Sylvain
Best Regards,
Wenyou Yang
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list