[PATCH] ARM: dts: re-fromat AT91 part to match other entries

[Olof Johansson]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 04:45:02PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> Le 14/01/2015 10:05, Arnd Bergmann a écrit :
> > On Wednesday 14 January 2015 00:47:59 Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> >>
> >> On 13/01/2015 at 15:09:56 -0800, Olof Johansson wrote :
> >>> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:43:00PM +0100, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >>>> The entries are separated as ARM V4/V5 and ARM V7 as some other per-SoC config
> >>>> options may be removed in the near future.
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre at atmel.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> Hi Olof,
> >>>>
> >>>> This is an attempt to match other ARM SoC families format.
> >>>> If you feel that the patch can be good, do not hesitate to take it yourself. I
> >>>> don't plan to integrate it in any of my pull-request so it can appear quickly in
> >>>> arm-soc and can be used by everyone.
> >>>
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> If you see what Peter did, he split up the rules per-SoC based on how
> >>> things were selectable in Kconfig. Since you seem to have the Kconfig
> >>> entries already, how about doing the same? That way the same information
> >>> w.r.t. SoC family that you have as comments isn't lost either.
> >>>
> >>
> >> You didn't see the patch set yet because it depends on a lot of other
> >> series still being discussed but after the switch to multiplatform, the
> >> only config option left will be SOC_AT91RM9200, SOC_AT91SAM9 (both
> >> under SOC_SAM_V4_V5) and SOC_SAMA5, under SOC_SAM_V7.
> >>
> >> That's our plan, unless you feel that we should keep one config option
> >> per SoC.
> > 
> > With the patches that I prepared last year, all of AT91SAM9 becomes
> > one small file, so there really isn't any need to have separate Kconfig
> > options.
> 
> Hi Olof,
> 
> After what noted Alexandre and Arnd, don't you think my initial attempt
> was okay? Aka: ping ;-)

Ah, yes. Applied now.


-Olof