[PATCH 00/13] ARM: shmobile: Remove sh7372/Mackerel and ZBOOT MMC/SDHI support

Simon Horman horms at verge.net.au
Sun Jan 25 16:22:16 PST 2015

On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 01:52:56PM +0900, Magnus Damm wrote:
> ARM: shmobile: Remove sh7372/Mackerel and ZBOOT MMC/SDHI support
> [PATCH 01/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Remove ZBOOT code
> [PATCH 02/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Remove Legacy C board code
> [PATCH 03/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel dts: Remove Legacy DTS file
> [PATCH 04/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Remove DT binding documentation
> [PATCH 05/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Remove mach-type entry
> [PATCH 06/13] ARM: shmobile: mackerel: Remove defconfig
> [PATCH 07/13] ARM: shmobile: sh7372: Remove ZBOOT MMC/SDHI support
> [PATCH 08/13] ARM: shmobile: sh7372: Remove Legacy C SoC code
> [PATCH 09/13] ARM: shmobile: sh7372: Remove DT binding documentation
> [PATCH 10/13] ARM: shmobile: sh7372 dtsi: Remove Legacy DTSI file
> [PATCH 11/13] Documentation: Remove ZBOOT MMC/SDHI utility and docs
> [PATCH 12/13] pinctrl: sh-pfc: sh7372: Remove PFC support
> [PATCH 13/13] pinctrl: sh-pfc: sh7372: Remove DT binding documentation
> Remove legacy board and SoC support for Mackerel and sh7372. Both the
> ARM mach-shmobile code base and the PINCTRL subsystem is affected.
> Also get rid of the remaining ZBOOT MMC/SDHI code, documentation and
> utility that has no user once sh7372 is gone.
> The Cortex-A8 based sh7372 SoC is rather old and never went into mass
> production anyway, so these patches that remove SoC and board support
> will only affect a few selected developers.
> I wish we had some way to make use of the ZBOOT MMC/SDHI code, but
> without any board or SoC code it makes little sense to keep it.
> Signed-off-by: Magnus Damm <damm+renesas at opensource.se>

Hi Magnus,

thanks for putting this together. There seem to have been few comments
made on it. Could you consider respinning accordingly?

More information about the linux-arm-kernel mailing list