[PATCH v2 RESEND 2/8] irqchip: Supply new driver for STi based devices
Thomas Gleixner
tglx at linutronix.de
Sat Jan 24 03:48:51 PST 2015
On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jan 2015, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > The only technical comment I have is: shouldn't all the stuff except
> > the resume function be marked __init or is any of this required post
> > init?
>
> It's not common to mark functions invoked at and affter *_probe() as
> __init. At least, not as far as I'm aware.
Right, if the probe stuff is supposed to be functional post init, then
we of course need to keep it around. But I guess we have no mechanism
to distinguish the 'boot only' and 'keep post init' case. Might be
worthwhile to investigate.
Thanks,
tglx
More information about the linux-arm-kernel
mailing list